The Sordid World of Opus Dei

 

 https://substack.com/home/post/p-190525289

From Zionism to Catholicism

Jews & Porn, Porn & Jews

John Zmirak pleases Jews & Protestants by showing them he's a cuck.

And, how bad did things have to get for these losers to turn on Scott Hahn? Careful Catholic Answers, you may be next as John teams up with Tel-Aviv Ted Cruz Missile. 

De Bonald Contra Jewish Emancipation

[From @BThiong1885] Did you know?

Louis de Bonald (1754-1840), the great French counter-revolutionary thinker, monarchist and traditionalist Catholic, published a virulent text in 1806 against the emancipation of the Jews, denouncing Judaism as a foreign, parasitic force incompatible with French Christian society?

Louis de Bonald embodies the lucid reaction against the Revolution: he sees the Jewish emancipation of 1791 not as progress, but as an existential threat that dissolves the traditional order, Christian morality and national cohesion.

In his article “On the Jews” (Mercure de France, 8 February 1806), he asserts that the Jews form an “imperium in imperio” (a state within a state), that they are at war with Christian morality, that they live as parasites and remain a perpetually foreign people, even on French soil.
He compares their situation to that of freed Blacks and accuses the Enlightenment philosophers of having intellectually armed this senseless emancipation. He even goes so far as to write that if a Jewish Sanhedrin became the legislator, it could not produce laws more atrocious than those of the revolutionary Convention.

For Bonald, Judaism is not merely a different religion: it is a parallel society that refuses assimilation, practises usury and undermines the Catholic foundations of France. He calls for the return of discriminatory measures (distinctive markings, professional restrictions) to protect the nation.

Links in French that confirm these criticisms (serious sources):

• French Wikipedia article on Louis de Bonald (detailed section on his 1806 antisemitic text with quotes):
  https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_de_Bonald#Sur_les_Juifs
• Original text “Sur les Juifs” (Mercure de France, 1806) available on Gallica:
  https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k1040572f/f9.item
• Jewish Encyclopedia (English article but very precise on his accusations: imperium in imperio, parasites, war against morality):
  https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3464-bonald-louis-gabriel-ambroise-vicomte-de
• Analysis in “Les gauches antisémites” (Fondapol) which explicitly mentions his 1806 text:
  https://www.fondapol.org/etude/les-gauches-antisemites/

(The post also includes a classical portrait of Louis de Bonald.)

SSPX Sends Book to Italian Bishops to Justify Upcoming Episcopal Consecrations

[katholisches.info] The Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) has launched a targeted information campaign ahead of its announced episcopal consecrations on July 1, 2026. According to reports, the traditionalist community sent a specially published book to every Italian diocesan bishop outlining its motives.

The volume, titled Al servizio della Chiesa ("In the Service of the Church") with the subtitle "The Episcopal Consecrations of the Society of St. Pius X," was published by the society's own press, Edizioni Piane. It aims to explain the theological and canonical arguments used by the SSPX to justify the planned consecrations. The content follows the line of reasoning established by its founder, Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, in 1988, which he termed "Operation Survival" for Tradition.

"In the Service of the Church: The Episcopal Consecrations"

The work portrays a deep crisis within the Church where—according to the Society's position—even ecclesiastical authorities are contributing to the spread of a "falsified faith." From this, the SSPX derives a "right to resistance" against the hierarchy. A quote from St. Paul’s Epistle to the Galatians, warning against the preaching of a "different gospel," serves as a programmatic opening.

The book was accompanied by a letter from the Italian District Superior, Father Gabriele D’Avino. In it, the action is described as an invitation to diocesan bishops to engage with the current state of the Church and enter into a process of "joint reflection."

Parallel Efforts in German-Speaking Regions

Simultaneously, the Society published its own brochure in the German-speaking world, compiling essential information regarding the upcoming consecrations. This publication is explicitly intended as a contribution to transparency and aims to provide supporting arguments for priests, the faithful, and interested parties.

Whether this initiative will resonate with the recipients remains to be seen. Observers note that even fundamental texts on recent church history are often little known. Nevertheless, the SSPX's approach shows that it is making an effort not only to justify its controversial steps internally but also to represent them proactively to the Catholic public, seeking contact with other parts of the Church.

Text: Giuseppe Nardi 

Image: Edizioni Piane (Screenshot)

AMDG

Iron and Fire: Breaking the Rogue States of 1816 and 2026

British Ships of the Line at Algiers, August 26th 1816

Military history is often sanitized (and weaponized, no pun intended) for the purposes of propaganda, and demoralization of Western peoples and our story, it can be a mercy and a salvation to delve  into maps and maneuvers, where they can reveal and spell out the sinuous, harmonious connections underlying the story of our people, of Christendom, which is sometimes sorrowful, often triumphant, one of these connections is between the Bombardment of Algiers (1816) and Operation Epic Fury (2026) which were righteous, powerful responses to regimes that had pushed the international community to a breaking point. To understand these conflicts, one must look at the predatory nature of the targeted states and the devastating "super weapons" deployed to dismantle them.

The Butcher’s Bill: Regimes of Terror

The history of the West’s conflict with Islam is ancient, and it is incredible that the same personalities and physiognomies play themselves out over the centuries, just as Alexander the Great turned east and struck down Persian power, establishing a lasting connection and hegemony of the West over the Orient, and the latest conflict, involving the murderous and brutal Iranian regime and yet another righteously vengeful Western power. Such was the case in the way Western states dealt with Islamic pirate states in the 19th century, a continuation of centuries of war and piracy directed against European people by these brutal people which continues even to this day!

The Deylik of Algiers in 1816 was not a standard diplomatic partner; it was a state built on the economy of human suffering. For three centuries, the Barbary pirates had enslaved over a million Europeans, snatching victims from as far away as Iceland. By 1816, the "white slave trade" had reached a fever pitch of cruelty. The Dey, Omar Agha, famously treated diplomats with contempt, once even detaining the British Consul in irons. The bombardment was sparked by a horrific massacre of 200 Sicilian and Corsican fishermen under British protection—men who were slaughtered or dragged into chains while they slept.

The Iranian Regime in 2026 mirror-imaged this domestic and regional brutality. Leading up to the strikes, the Islamic Republic had engaged in what Amnesty International called the "deadliest period of repression in decades." In January 2026 alone, security forces carried out mass killings of thousands of protesters, using heavy machine guns on civilians in cities like Bandar Abbas and Neyshabur. Combined with their "nuclear breakout" and the constant threat to global energy through the mining of the Strait of Hormuz, the regime had become an existential "rogue actor" that the Trump administration viewed as beyond the reach of traditional sanctions. Iran has long leveled its murderous intent against European peoples, including the US Marines in Beruit bombing in 1983, an operation by the way, which the Mossad was aware of and didn’t forewarn us. Our greatest ally. 

The Hammer: British Ships of the Line

When diplomacy failed in 1816, the British sent the "super weapons" of the 19th century: the First-Rate Ship of the Line.

 * HMS Queen Charlotte: Admiral Pellew’s flagship was a floating fortress carrying over 100 guns. During the battle, it anchored just 80 yards from the Algerian mole—literally within spitting distance of the enemy batteries.

 * The Firepower: The Allied fleet fired over 50,000 round shots using 118 tons of gunpowder in a single afternoon.

 * Congreve Rockets: These were the "smart bombs" of the era—early incendiary missiles that arched over the city’s walls, turning the Algerian navy into a bonfire within their own harbor.

The carnage was "sanguinary" (bloody). The British casualty rate was 16%, nearly double that of the Battle of Trafalgar. It wasn't a tactical dance; it was a grueling, industrial-scale demolition of a city.

A Barbary pirate, Pier Francesco Mola, 1650 (Wikicommons)

The Lightning: Trump’s "Epic Fury"

In 2026, the weaponry shifted from massed cannon fire to "invisible" precision. Operation Epic Fury showcased a suite of high-tech assets designed to strike without warning:

 * B-21 Raider & B-2 Spirit: Stealth bombers flew directly into the most "impenetrable" Iranian air defenses, dropping 30,000-pound Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP) to collapse nuclear bunkers buried deep under mountains.

 * The PrSM (Precision Strike Missile): Fired from HIMARS units, these missiles reached speeds and accuracies that rendered Iranian "S-400" defense systems obsolete.

 * Decapitation Tech: Unlike 1816, where the goal was to hit the city, 2026 focused on the individual. The use of "R9X" kinetic missiles—the so-called "flying ginsu" with blades instead of explosives—allowed for the targeted elimination of IRGC leadership while they were in moving vehicles, a level of terrifying precision that the British of 1816 could only have dreamed of.

Conclusion: The Price of Defiance

Despite the differences in the weapons, many things are the same, the antagonists are the same, the same Oriental cruelty and arrogance is the present. For now, we have the technological superiority Christian nations have lacked in the past, but we still fight on.

Both Algiers and Tehran underestimated the "breaking point" of a global power. In 1816, the British proved that wooden ships could survive a shore battery long enough to level a city. In 2026, the U.S. proved that geographic isolation and deep bunkers offer no protection against fifth-generation warfare.

In both cases, the "super weapons" achieved their immediate goal: the Dey of Algiers surrendered and freed 3,000 slaves the next day, and the Iranian command structure was shattered in 100 hours.

At this point, we stand at a brief pause as the world waits for the pause. Like the English King Henry V at Harfleuer, or Admiral Exner in Algeria, a successful bluff decided the day. Is the Don making a similar bluff, or is he stalling while he waits for ground forces and additional carriers arrive to steel the resolve of his diplomacy?

AMDG

The Conflict (1973) with Comrade Sheen

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholics_(ITV_Sunday_Night_Theatre)

Will the 3rd Temple be rebuilt?

Lyin' Ted the bigot

James Condit, Sr. Passes Away

Edit: he will be remember as a conscientious and diligent attorney as well as a defender of the unborn, and a super nice man. He will be missed and his shoes will be impossible to fill. May the perpetual light shine upon him.

Funeral Mass:
 Sacred Heart Church

2733 Massachusetts Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45225

Fortified by the sacraments of the Holy Mother Church, James J. Condit, Sr. of Cincinnati, Ohio, passed peacefully into eternal life at 95 years old, on Monday, March 9, 2026. He was preceded in death by his wife Rose Marie, his oldest son James Condit, Jr. and his oldest grandchild, Therese Condit.

Born on April 8, 1930, Jim was the eldest of 9 children in an Irish, hard-working family. He was a distinguished lawyer marked by deep faith, fierce defender of the unborn and endless service to the vulnerable. 

Jim attended St. Margaret of Cortona grade school, Purcell High School, Xavier University, Chase Law School & was an US Army veteran. 

In 1952, he married Rose Marie (Kenney) and was blessed with 64 years of marriage. He was a loving husband & devoted father whose wisdom, faith, and gentle guidance will shape generations to come. 

Jim was survived by his wife of 10 years,

Mary Lou (Kohnen) Donoghue, 5 siblings, 

10 children, and 147 grand/great grandchildren.

A visitation will be held at Gilligan Funeral Home, 8225 Montgomery Road, Cincinnati on Sunday March 15, 2026, from 3pm-8pm. A Requiem Funeral Mass at Sacred Heart Church, 2733 Massachusetts Ave, Cincinnati, will take place on March 16, 2026 at 10:00 am. Burial to follow at Gate of Heaven Cemetery.

In lieu of flowers, the family suggests donations to Cincinnati Right to life (Cincinnatirighttolife.org) and Villa Licci (VillaLicci.org)

A full obituary and condolences may be expressed at gilliganfuneralhomes.com

Posted online on March 11, 2026

Published in Cincinnati Enquirer

AMDG

The Goyim Apocalypse

Exorcist Fr. Chad Ripperger appears on The Shawn Ryan Show and the Snowflakes have a conniption

If you've never heard of the well-fed Mike Lewis, think of someone like Mark Shea who can use a fork.  For several years he has run the Where Peter Is website, a website we dismissed for years as satire like Eye of the Tiber and Liturgical Road Apples.   Those satirical sites just couldn't compete with real news for laughs any longer.   Now Fr. Ripperger has lived rent free in Lewis' brain for some time so it was no surprise that when it was announced he'd be appearing on one of the most popular podcasts in the world, Mike would be all over it like stink on shit.   In anticipation of the show, he set out to slander the good exorcist. 

His article was then followed by an appearance on Eternal Life Plan with another papolotrist, a well fed former Church Militant employee who is tormented by demons from a troubled past.  Both admit that they didn't watch the whole show before going live but who could blame them?   Does anyone  think they ever went four hours without eating?

     

Another title we considered for this post:  Bearded Lady from the Circus Interviews Vaccine Injured Pundit.

The Great Baptist/Catholic Debate: Christian-Zionism to Butt-Sex

NB: this is a respectful discussion with no name calling nor straw men arguments.

Shorter YouTube link if you prefer

Jonesa Locuta, Causa Finita Est!

 

AMDG

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18URDFD3ob/

See, EMJ doesn't hate Jews

How many readers will eventually be excommunicated?

Communiqué of the General House: Answer of the Society to Rome

[katholisches.info] The response of the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) to Rome is now available. Here is the full text:

Communiqué regarding the response of the General Council of the Priestly Society of St. Pius X to the proposal of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith.

During the meeting on February 12 between Father Pagliarani, Superior General of the Society of St. Pius X, and His Eminence Víctor Manuel Cardinal Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith—which was organized following the announcement of future episcopal consecrations for the Society—the latter proposed a "specifically theological path of dialogue following a very precise methodology, [...] in order to work out the necessary minimum requirements for full communion with the Catholic Church," and tied this dialogue to the suspension of the announced episcopal consecrations.

At the request of the Prefect of the Dicastery, the Superior General presented this proposal to the members of his Council and took the necessary time to evaluate it.

On February 18, Father Pagliarani transmitted his written response to the Cardinal, accompanied by several appendices and signed by the five members of the General Council.

Since the matter is now public knowledge due to the Holy See's communication on February 12, it seems appropriate to also publish the content of this letter and its appendices, to give interested faithful the opportunity to know the exact response given.

The Superior General entrusts this situation to the prayers of the members of the Society and all the faithful. He asks that the Rosary, as well as the sacrifices of the Lenten season now beginning, be offered especially for the Holy Father, for the good of the Holy Church, and for the worthy preparation of souls for the ceremony on July 1.

Menzingen, February 19, 2026

Included Documents:

 * Letter from Father Pagliarani to Cardinal Fernández, dated February 18, 2026.

 * Appendix I: Letter from Father Pagliarani to Msgr. Pozzo, dated January 17, 2019.

 * Appendix II: Consecration and Jurisdiction: Unattainability of the Accusation of Schism, dated February 4, 2026.

 * Appendix III: Letter from Cardinal Müller to Msgr. Fellay, dated June 6, 2017.

Image source: fsspx.news (Screenshot)

AMDG

Mohamedan Attacks Guard at Tomb of Unknown in Paris

Edit: the liberalized West is toxic to European peoples.

[France 24] A man wielding a knife and scissors was fatally shot by police in Paris on Friday when he tried to attack an officer during a ceremony at the city’s Arc de Triomphe monument, officials said. 

 The suspect, a French national born in 1978 who had previously been convicted in Belgium on terrorist-related charges, died at hospital from his injuries, the French counterterrorism prosecutor’s office said. Authorities did not release the suspect’s name. The attacker targeted an officer who was guarding the ceremony for relighting the eternal flame honoring unknown soldiers at the Napoleon-era landmark, according to a Paris police official. Another officer shot the attacker, the official said. 

No bystanders or police officers were injured in the incident, the official said.

AMDG

Another Right Influencer Mortally Wounded by Antifa

Here is the "Who, What, Where, and When" breakdown of this event, which has become a focal point for discussions on political violence in Europe.

A few years ago, some might remember when Arabs attacked a traditional Catholic figure, Goldofaf.

The Incident Report

 * Who: Quentin, a 23-year-old conservative/right-wing activist. He is described as a member of the collective Les Remparts or associated with the Uni student union.

 * What: A violent physical altercation that occurred during or on the sidelines of a demonstration. According to reports and circulating footage, Quentin was allegedly swarmed and brutally beaten by a group of individuals identified as Antifa (extreme-left activists). The attack resulted in a severe brain hemorrhage, leaving him in a critical condition/coma.

 * Where: Lyon, France, specifically in the Saint-Jean district, an area known for frequent tensions between far-left and far-right groups.

 * When: February 2026 (with the most intense media coverage peaking around February 10-13, 2026).

The Charlie Kirk Comparison

There is a comparison to Charlie Kirk being drawn by many commentators to highlight what they see as a media and institutional double standard.

This as a "Moment of Truth" for the West:

“The video of Quentin being beaten in Lyon isn't just a recording of a crime; it’s a recording of a political reality that Charlie Kirk has warned about for years—one where the ideological label of the attacker dictates the volume of the outcry."

Would you like me to refine that blog post with these specific names and locations included.

The Unseen Struggle: What the Quintin Turner Video Reveals About Political Violence and Selective Outrage

A disturbing video has been circulating, capturing the moments leading up to the tragic death of Quintin Turner during a demonstration. It’s a raw, visceral look at how quickly tensions can ignite and turn fatal on our streets. The footage itself is chaotic—a struggle, an altercation, and then the devastating outcome: Quintin Turner struck and suffering brain death.

But beyond the immediate horror of the video, this incident, particularly when framed by the alleged involvement of individuals associated with Antifa, forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about how we discuss and react to political violence in America.

The Video: A Glimpse into the Brink

The video isn’t just a record of an event; it's a stark reminder of the escalating risks faced by those who engage in or even observe protests. It shows the struggle, the heightened emotions, and the split-second decisions—or misjudgments—that can have irreversible consequences. For many, seeing such a struggle culminate in a death raises immediate questions about self-defense, provocation, and the blurred lines between activism and aggression.

The Echoes of Selective Outrage

This is where the conversation often veers into hypocrisy, and figures like Charlie Kirk often become central to that discussion. Kirk, a prominent voice on the conservative right, is known for his passionate denunciations of political violence, particularly when it originates from "the left." He frequently highlights incidents involving Antifa or other progressive groups, painting them as inherently violent and a threat to public order.

Consider how an incident like Quintin Turner's death—a man allegedly killed by someone associated with Antifa during a demonstration—would likely be amplified by Kirk. He would, understandably, point to it as Exhibit A in his argument about the dangers of anti-fascist movements and the need for law and order. He would frame it as a clear-cut case of left-wing extremism resulting in a fatality, demanding accountability and robust condemnation.

However, the critical comparison lies in the consistency of that outrage.

The Double Standard:

Where is the equivalent fervor, the same level of condemnation, when violence emanates from the right? When incidents involve white supremacists, far-right militias, or even individuals inspired by right-wing rhetoric committing acts of violence, the response from figures like Kirk often shifts. The rhetoric sometimes softens, blame is diffused, or the incidents are framed as isolated acts rather than systemic issues. We see exhaustive explanations, justifications, or attempts to draw false equivalences, rather than the immediate, unequivocal denunciation reserved for "the other side."

The Quintin Turner video, regardless of the full legal context or individual culpability, serves as a powerful illustration of this double standard. It demands that we look beyond the partisan framing and ask: Are we truly concerned about political violence, or only about political violence that suits our existing narratives?

Moving Forward:

The death of Quintin Turner is a tragedy. Every life lost to political conflict is a stain on our society. The video of the struggle is difficult to watch precisely because it forces us to confront the dangerous realities of our polarized landscape.

Instead of merely using such incidents as fodder for partisan point-scoring, we should leverage them as moments for genuine introspection. Can we condemn violence, unequivocally, regardless of the ideological banner under which it is committed? Until we can, the cycle of selective outrage will continue, and real understanding—and ultimately, real peace—will remain elusive.

AMDG