TRUMP MUST ORDER 60 DEMOCRAT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE MEMBERS TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY AT EVERY MASS AND LITURGY Donald Trump must mandate in the USA that the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal must be the normative ecclesiology of the Catholic Church at all rites and liturgies.Pope Francis, the cardinal, bishops and the USCCB have an obligation to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church only rationally. They presently interpret Church Documents dishonestly.This can be confirmed and checked objectively. This is also the error of the 60 Catholic members of the House of Representatives, who issued a statement of principles. They are dishonest on Vatican Council II. The U.S Ambassador to the vatican must announce that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. So they are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 etc, which did not mention any exceptions. So Vatican Council II is not a break with the past moral and faith theology of the Church.Homosexual unions, divorce and abortions cannot be justified with an unethical interpretation of Vatican Council II. Neither can the Latin Mass be abolished since its ecclesiolofy is opposed by the conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted with a fake premise, inference and conclusion. In the USA, Catholics have an obligation to interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being invisible cases which can only be known to God. So Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and is not a rupture. This must be expressed at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass in the USA. The USCCB cannot legally continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. President Trump must ask the 60 U.S House of Representatives, Catholic members, who signed a document of principles, to stop interpreting Vatican Council II dishonestly to produce a liberal conclusion. This is unethical. They include :- Rosa DeLauro Sylvia Garcia Brendan Boyle Norma Torres Veronica Escobar Grace F. Napolitano Gerry Connolly etc. https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/catholic-members-congress-release-statement-principles - Lionel Andrades https://www.isje.org/frequena/33.2.requena.pdf
House panel releases report on FBI's targeting of traditional Catholics …The document defined “radical-traditionalist Catholics” as those who reject “the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council” and express “disdain for most of the popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II.” The memo also maintained that RTCs adhere to “anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBT, and white supremacist ideology…” https://www.christiandaily.com/news/house-panel-releases-report-on-fbis-targeting-of-catholics
PRESIDENT TRUMP MUST TELL THE SPLC AND THE US STATE DEPT(ANTI SEMITISM SECTION) TO PLEASE INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY AND HONESTLY
The document, titled “nterest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities,” characterizes radical-traditional Catholics or “RTCs” by “the rejection of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council; disdain for most of the popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II; and frequent adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and white supremacist ideology." https://www.heritage.org/religious-liberty/commentary/the-fbis-targeting-radical-traditional-catholics-bodes-ill
The advisory included an analyst note stating that, “RTCs are typically characterized by the rejection of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council; disdain for most popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II; and frequent adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and white supremacist ideology.” https://www.lankford.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/media/doc/fbi_letter_director.pdf _____________________________________________ President Trump must ask the Southern Poverty Law Center to re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally. The conclusion will be traditional and not liberal. LG 8,14,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases and so do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, of the three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions. Also the baptism of desire mentioned in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney refers to a hypothetical case. So it is not a practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was held by Fr. Leonard Feeney, the dismissed Catholic professors of Boston College and the St. Benedict Centers. The Jesuits at Boston College and the Department of Theology still interpret LG 8,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times .Then they presume that these 'visible cases' have made the dogma EENS, the Athanasis Creed and the Catechisms, obsolete. The SPLC cannot continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and accept the error in the 1949 LOHO without correcting it and then expect Catholics to follow the SPLC’s dishonest interpretation. Why should traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly ? Fr.Leonard Feeney opposed the Jewish Left, the Zionist and Masons and not Jews in general whom the SPLC does not represent. There are Jewish Rabbis who oppose LGBT rights, abortion and homosexual unions. - Lionel Andrades
NON APOSTOLIC, NON MAGISTERIAL VISITATIONS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH MUST STOP
FSSP announces novena, consecration to Our Lady during Vatican visitation https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fssp-announces-novena-consecration-to-our-lady-during-vatican-visitation/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=usa
The FSSP will receieve a non apostolic visitation from the Vatican . The visitors will interpret Church Documents, including Vatican Council II , irationally and non apostolically and expect the FSSP to accept the liberal result. The liberal conclusion will be projected as a break with the exclusivist ecclesiolofy of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass. The US Ambassador to the Vatican could ask Pope Francis and President Trump to stop the coercion of the FSSP and other traditionalists in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and so non Magisterially. At Frejuf- Toulon, France Bishop Dominique Rey was removed and a new bishop installed who interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly and does not deny it.- Lionel Andrades
8 comments:
It would allow fairy Catholics like Mark Shea to tie all their prejudices together with a nice little bow. 🙇♂️ 🙇♀️
Mark Shea is Catholic?
is the pope?
TRUMP MUST ORDER 60 DEMOCRAT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE MEMBERS TO INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY AT EVERY MASS AND LITURGY
Donald Trump must mandate in the USA that the exclusivist ecclesiology of the Roman Missal must be the normative ecclesiology of the Catholic Church at all rites and liturgies.Pope Francis, the cardinal, bishops and the USCCB have an obligation to interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church only rationally. They presently interpret Church Documents dishonestly.This can be confirmed and checked objectively. This is also the error of the 60 Catholic members of the House of Representatives, who issued a statement of principles. They are dishonest on Vatican Council II.
The U.S Ambassador to the vatican must announce that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, and GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to hypothetical cases only. So they are not objective exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 etc, which did not mention any exceptions. So Vatican Council II is not a break with the past moral and faith theology of the Church.Homosexual unions, divorce and abortions cannot be justified with an unethical interpretation of Vatican Council II. Neither can the Latin Mass be abolished since its ecclesiolofy is opposed by the conclusion of Vatican Council II interpreted with a fake premise, inference and conclusion.
In the USA, Catholics have an obligation to interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being invisible cases which can only be known to God.
So Vatican Council II has a continuity with the past exclusivist ecclesiology of the Church and is not a rupture. This must be expressed at the Novus Ordo and Latin Mass in the USA. The USCCB cannot legally continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally.
President Trump must ask the 60 U.S House of Representatives, Catholic members, who signed a document of principles, to stop interpreting Vatican Council II dishonestly to produce a liberal conclusion. This is unethical. They include :-
Rosa DeLauro
Sylvia Garcia
Brendan Boyle
Norma Torres
Veronica Escobar
Grace F. Napolitano
Gerry Connolly etc. https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/catholic-members-congress-release-statement-principles
- Lionel Andrades
https://www.isje.org/frequena/33.2.requena.pdf
House panel releases report on FBI's targeting of traditional Catholics
…The document defined “radical-traditionalist Catholics” as those who reject “the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council” and express “disdain for most of the popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II.” The memo also maintained that RTCs adhere to “anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBT, and white supremacist ideology…”
https://www.christiandaily.com/news/house-panel-releases-report-on-fbis-targeting-of-catholics
Someone should tell Lionel that he's dreaming.
I am ESL so please hold with me. Are you a heretic and what is your meaning? Trump is not Pope and it is not funny.
PRESIDENT TRUMP MUST TELL THE SPLC AND THE US STATE DEPT(ANTI SEMITISM SECTION) TO PLEASE INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY AND HONESTLY
The document, titled “nterest of Racially or Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremists in Radical Traditionalist Catholic Ideology Almost Certainly Presents New Mitigation Opportunities,” characterizes radical-traditional Catholics or “RTCs” by “the rejection of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council; disdain for most of the popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II; and frequent adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and white supremacist ideology."
https://www.heritage.org/religious-liberty/commentary/the-fbis-targeting-radical-traditional-catholics-bodes-ill
The advisory included an analyst note stating that, “RTCs are typically characterized by the rejection of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) as a valid church council; disdain for most popes elected since Vatican II, particularly Pope Francis and Pope John Paul II; and frequent adherence to anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, anti-LGBTQ, and white supremacist ideology.”
https://www.lankford.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/media/doc/fbi_letter_director.pdf
_____________________________________________
President Trump must ask the Southern Poverty Law Center to re-interpret Vatican Council II rationally. The conclusion will be traditional and not liberal. LG 8,14,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible cases and so do not contradict the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, of the three Church Councils which did not mention any exceptions.
Also the baptism of desire mentioned in the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston relative to Fr. Leonard Feeney refers to a hypothetical case. So it is not a practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as it was held by Fr. Leonard Feeney, the dismissed Catholic professors of Boston College and the St. Benedict Centers. The Jesuits at Boston College and the Department of Theology still interpret LG 8,16,UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as being physically visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church in the present times .Then they presume that these 'visible cases' have made the dogma EENS, the Athanasis Creed and the Catechisms, obsolete.
The SPLC cannot continue to interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and accept the error in the 1949 LOHO without correcting it and then expect Catholics to follow the SPLC’s dishonest interpretation. Why should traditionalists interpret Vatican Council II dishonestly ?
Fr.Leonard Feeney opposed the Jewish Left, the Zionist and Masons and not Jews in general whom the SPLC does not represent. There are Jewish Rabbis who oppose LGBT rights, abortion and homosexual unions.
- Lionel Andrades
NON APOSTOLIC, NON MAGISTERIAL VISITATIONS IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH MUST STOP
FSSP announces novena, consecration to Our Lady during Vatican visitation
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fssp-announces-novena-consecration-to-our-lady-during-vatican-visitation/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=usa
The FSSP will receieve a non apostolic visitation from the Vatican . The visitors will interpret Church Documents, including Vatican Council II , irationally and non apostolically and expect the FSSP to accept the liberal result. The liberal conclusion will be projected as a break with the exclusivist ecclesiolofy of the Roman Missal of the Latin Mass.
The US Ambassador to the Vatican could ask Pope Francis and President Trump to stop the coercion of the FSSP and other traditionalists in the name of Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and so non Magisterially.
At Frejuf- Toulon, France Bishop Dominique Rey was removed and a new bishop installed who interprets the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms dishonestly and does not deny it.- Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment