I proudly serve at the altar and hope to again next weekend if our Pastor gives me the chance. Problem is, he’s mad with me and my behavior. When Father is mad at me, I try to pretend I’m praying, but that makes him even angrier. Usually, I upset him by getting too snarky with my fellow servers. I called one J’ish (not sure what that even means to be honest), and told another that he’s not Catholic. Another I told to go hide in a hole. I’ve called them all idiots, to my shame. Father took me aside to talk with me, and asked what I do in my free time. “Truth is,” I said to him, “I pretty much only browser the Eponymous Flower from Sunday to Sunday.” I told him about how much I look up to Tancred, and try to be just like him. That’s when Father said, “Tancred sounds like a nasty cunt. Forget all about him and stop visiting that site.” Then, we offered a Mass for Tancred. I came back to see if things have changed, but it’s all the same. I’m sorry, Tancred, but I can’t keep visiting your site if I’m going to be holy like my Pastor. Pray for me that I stay away from here.
HOW CAN YOU HAVE A POPE WHO DOES NOT INTERPRET THE ATHANASIUS CREED, THE DOGMA EENS AND VAITICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY' Patrick Coffin, How can you have a pope who interprets the Athanasius Creed irrationally and does not deny it? How can you have a pope who rejects the Athanasius Creed ? How can you have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally to produce a break and rejection of the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus? How can you have a pope who does not accept and interpret Vatican Council II 0and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally? How can you have a pope who rejects the four marks of the Church ( Nicene Creed) by interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally in public ? The cardinals and bishops do not deny it. I interpret all Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils and Catechisms) rationally only. I do not confuse what is invisible as being visible, unknown as being known , subjective as being objective and then produced a nontraditional conclusion which is non Magisterial, non apostolic and a rupture with the pre-1949 Magisterium. People now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional, which the pope must accept. This is obligatory also for the cardinals and bishops.- Lionel Andrades
2 comments:
I proudly serve at the altar and hope to again next weekend if our Pastor gives me the chance. Problem is, he’s mad with me and my behavior. When Father is mad at me, I try to pretend I’m praying, but that makes him even angrier. Usually, I upset him by getting too snarky with my fellow servers. I called one J’ish (not sure what that even means to be honest), and told another that he’s not Catholic. Another I told to go hide in a hole. I’ve called them all idiots, to my shame. Father took me aside to talk with me, and asked what I do in my free time. “Truth is,” I said to him, “I pretty much only browser the Eponymous Flower from Sunday to Sunday.” I told him about how much I look up to Tancred, and try to be just like him. That’s when Father said, “Tancred sounds like a nasty cunt. Forget all about him and stop visiting that site.” Then, we offered a Mass for Tancred. I came back to see if things have changed, but it’s all the same. I’m sorry, Tancred, but I can’t keep visiting your site if I’m going to be holy like my Pastor. Pray for me that I stay away from here.
HOW CAN YOU HAVE A POPE WHO DOES NOT INTERPRET THE ATHANASIUS CREED, THE DOGMA EENS AND VAITICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY'
Patrick Coffin,
How can you have a pope who interprets the Athanasius Creed irrationally and does not deny it? How can you have a pope who rejects the Athanasius Creed ?
How can you have a pope who interprets Vatican Council II irrationally to produce a break and rejection of the Athanasius Creed and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus?
How can you have a pope who does not accept and interpret Vatican Council II 0and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally?
How can you have a pope who rejects the four marks of the Church ( Nicene Creed) by interpreting Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally in public ? The cardinals and bishops do not deny it.
I interpret all Magisterial Documents (Creeds, Councils and Catechisms) rationally only. I do not confuse what is invisible as being visible, unknown as being known , subjective as being objective and then produced a nontraditional conclusion which is non Magisterial, non apostolic and a rupture with the pre-1949 Magisterium.
People now know that Vatican Council II can be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional, which the pope must accept. This is obligatory also for the cardinals and bishops.- Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment