On the one hand, most of this is true. On the other hand, Dolore Cahill, a genius but not friendly to the Church, and a comedian who mocks the Church. I can see why John endorses it for the factual value, but couldn't he have cut out the bollocks? I think I've seen enough. I would find Gemma O'Doherty's comments interesting, but it seems she's been held near incommunicado, if not totally incommunicado. Pray for her.
On the one hand, most of this is true. On the other hand, Dolore Cahill, a genius but not friendly to the Church, and a comedian who mocks the Church. I can see why John endorses it for the factual value, but couldn't he have cut out the bollocks? I think I've seen enough. I would find Gemma O'Doherty's comments interesting, but it seems she's been held near incommunicado, if not totally incommunicado. Pray for her.
5 comments:
It all seems like a bad dream now. May we never forget!
On the one hand, most of this is true. On the other hand, Dolore Cahill, a genius but not friendly to the Church, and a comedian who mocks the Church. I can see why John endorses it for the factual value, but couldn't he have cut out the bollocks? I think I've seen enough. I would find Gemma O'Doherty's comments interesting, but it seems she's been held near incommunicado, if not totally incommunicado. Pray for her.
On the one hand, most of this is true. On the other hand, Dolore Cahill, a genius but not friendly to the Church, and a comedian who mocks the Church. I can see why John endorses it for the factual value, but couldn't he have cut out the bollocks? I think I've seen enough. I would find Gemma O'Doherty's comments interesting, but it seems she's been held near incommunicado, if not totally incommunicado. Pray for her.
I was wondering why no one is responding.
comment moderation?
Post a Comment