Thursday, December 21, 2023

African Bishops Oppose Bergoglio’s Aberroactivism

Edit: remember when ++Kasper attacked Africans? While Bergoglio continues to break a lance for his Preferential Option for Sodomy, the rest of the world has more important concerns than the immoral preoccupations of the decadent bourgeois class in the West.

Bergoglio’s pet sodomite adulates benders in publicity stunt


Meanwhile, Benders at NCR are prematurely celebrating, gushing and drinking champagne.

This is what the African Bishops think of all this faggotrie.


 AMDG

20 comments:

  1. Break a lance?
    No, the chocolates prefer bestiality

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gaybrielle no like darkies, do he?

    ReplyDelete
  3. "No, the chocolates prefer bestiality."

    Charming.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And while the African bishops attempt to claim the moral high ground on the blessings of 'irregular' relationships you won't see them condemning polygamy which is rife among African Moslems and non-Christian tribal group.

    They were robustly challenged at the Synod on the Family in 2014-15. They shut up after that because their selective moral relativism was exposed.

    Hubris and hypocrisy are common fare with that lot.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Shitlibs like the Anglicans always think they can silence African dissenters from their degenerate projects by accusing them of polygamy.

    I knew Gaybrielle would launch into this kind of diversion. So predictable.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's odd how you are always criticizing "gaybrielle" even when valid arguments are raised (I guess to avoid dealing with them): opus dei is spinning this as a blessing of sodomite unions, but it is permission to bless "irregular unions," i.e. the divorced and remarried, polygamy and fornicators--sure it could be used to bless a den of thieves. You also ignore that these nigerian bishops have instituted something called the "nigerian catholic church"--similar to opus dei wanting to institute "America's bishop" and "America's catholic church" under Strickland.

    Like Summorum Pontificum it bypasses bishops and gives the permission to priests so that even if the bishop opposes any priest is free to bless and is acting in accordance with the pope. All this "opposition" is non-sense, because no-one is required to bless (at this point). It is a testing of the waters and from any indication of what YOU are doing and all in your fellow opus dei blogosphere, YOU will do nothing (and thus step by step you accompany Satan to hell).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gaybrielle makes “valid arguments” ? What a joke. Gaybrielle as a rule uses cutesy rhetoric, insults, standard liberal talking points. He is a propagandist who for some strange reason has made it his mission to spread his vax enthusiasm to a trad audience. I find his sick demented mind a horror to behold.

      Delete
    2. Lot of homophobes trolling tonite.

      Delete
    3. It's not 'fear'

      Delete
  7. > "man" called "Gaybriell" makes valid arguments

    LOL

    ReplyDelete
  8. No doubt that if a sodomite couple are denied a "blessing" they will complain about it. Just as if they might complain if they are denied a wedding cake from a Christian baker. It's about weeding out the Catholics who actually believe in Church teaching.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Franklin Graham has said that no man, not ever the pope, can bless what G-d has condemned.

    ReplyDelete

  10. "Franklin Graham has said that no man, not ever the pope, can bless what G-d has condemned."

    God condemned killing - no exceptions - so how do people justify Capital Punishment which violates the divine commandment, "Thou shalt not kill."

    Show the reader the levels of sophistry and rationalization that the Good Ole Boys would reach in the process. Go Nemo 11:09 AM

    ReplyDelete
  11. Gaybrielle with another ridiculously easy to refute boomerism. It’s all the more comical that he feels himself looking down on everyone, especially Americans as his inferiors.

    https://www.hebrew4christians.com/Scripture/Torah/Ten_Cmds/Sixth_Cmd/sixth_cmd.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. Tucker is stumped and morally rattled which is the normal modus non-operandi.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Gaybrielle’s brilliance on display every day?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is Gabrielle paid to troll this blog or does he/she/them/they / do it for fun? 🙄

    ReplyDelete
  15. Gaybrielle is just an old boomer barking at the wind.

    ReplyDelete
  16. "It's not 'fear'"

    You're right, Nemo 5:52 PM. It's sheer terror that grips poor reactionary Tucker and disciple.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right, my Israeli troll friend, terrifyingly disgusting.

      Delete