Edit: what often happens, but not always, is that these premature announcements turn out to be untrue. I have little doubt there will be bishops consecrated.
Perhaps Shea, Voris, Dragonlady, and the gang at EWTN will launch an online Crusade against the Society’s alleged anti-Semitism. Oy veh!!!
AMDG
The Archdiocese said nothing different about their position on this issue.
ReplyDeleteGiggle-box Gaspers is inventing "News" that is not new.
Shadap, Gaybrielle.
ReplyDeleteFrancis isn’t as dumb as most trads think.
ReplyDeleteHe knows the most damage he can inflict on the Society is to recognise them. They lose there raisin detree
"They lose there raisin detree."
ReplyDeleteThere's nothing worse that can happen to a 'raisin'
The iPhone 📲 isn’t very good with dictation in the dark.
ReplyDeleteThe SSPX schismatic new bishops, if there are to be, will most definitely not be recognized by the Catholic Church. Like Lefebvre, they will collapse in upon themselves and perish.
ReplyDeletetest
ReplyDeleteJUNE 2, 2023
ReplyDeleteThe SSPX priests and faithful at their chapel in Rome interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Why should I do the same? The Council can be interpreted rationally and honestly.
The priests and laity at the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) chapel in Rome are not affirming the Catholic Faith in public in order to maintain their status, reputation, and worldly interests.
They are not affirming the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) and the Council of Florence (1442) which did not mention any exceptions.
Neither are they affirming Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc, as referring to hypothetical and visible cases, which are not objective exceptions for the dogma EENS.
The situation is the same at the Novus Ordo Mass in the rest of the churches and chapels in Rome. This is a denial of the Catholic Faith by even the Auxiliary bishops at the Rome Vicariate.
So the Nicene Creed has been changed and all the Catechisms contradicting each other.
The Oath of Office of the bishop is modernist at the Latin Mass and the Mass in the vernacular. Since the bishop interprets Magisterial Documents with the false premise i.e. invisible people are visible in the present times.
There are two Profession of faith, depending upon which of the two interpretations of Vatican Council II are chosen.
The SSPX is still selling books with Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally. This is unethical. It is the same at the Vatican offices for ecumenism etc.
The SSPX which expelled Fr. Florien Abrahamowich for political reasons, is now also not affirming the Catholic faith on Vatican Council II , the Creeds etc, for political reasons.
The SSPX priest and faithful at their chapel in Rome interpret Vatican Council II irrationally. Why should I do the same?
The Council can be interpreted rationally and honestly.- Lionel Andrades
JUNE 3, 2023
ReplyDeleteMattei is a good historian and his books on Tradition, the saints and popes, are recommended but not those on Vatican Council II or on subjects in which he has interpreted the Council irrationally and not rationally.
Roberto dei Mattei is still selling books on Vatican Council II interpreted irrationally and for how long is this to continue? I interpret LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, rationally. So they are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Vatican Council II does not contradict the Athanasius Creed and the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX neither does it contradict the Catechism of Pope Pius X (24Q, 27Q on other religions not being paths to salvation). The Council is traditional.
It is the same Vatican Council II before the both of us. But he interprets LG 8, as being physically visible cases. For me they are physically invisible cases in 2023.There have to be visible cases, for LG 8 etc, to be exceptions for the dogma EENS and the rest of Tradition. Invisible people cannot be exceptions.
The SSPX also is still selling books which project Vatican Council II as a break with the past. This is dishonest. Why should we interpret LG 8 etc as a break with the past?
We know that LG 8 etc can only be hypothetical, always. This was known over the centuries. It is common sense. So they did not project exceptions for EENS.
Mattei is a good historian and his books on Tradition, the saints and popes, are recommended but not those on Vatican Council II or on subjects in which he has interpreted the Council irrationally and not rationally.
Even Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and the SSPX bishops made the same mistake. They interpreted Vatican Council II like the liberals. Bishop Bernard Fellay can now choose to interpret the Council, like me. - Lionel Andrades
Mattei is pro-jab like Shea.
ReplyDelete"Mattei is pro-jab like Shea." Just like Bonker Trump and his entire grizzle guts entourage, just like Lionel the Obsessed and so many more.
ReplyDeleteGet the jab, all five of them and live.