Edit: basically, one of the Eucharistic Monsters didn’t have enough Hosts and probably forgot that they/their had additional Hosts in the ciborium. Alzheimer’s is the first thing I thought of.
Another sign that there’s likely nothing miraculous going on at these “Masses”, besides the fact that a Eucharistic Monster hands out sacrilegious Communion in the hand, is that the tabernacle has no veil.
Presybyter: “…Sometimes it comes in this weird way…” After saying how it was “pretty cool”, a few laity scattered in the church gave themselves some half-hearted applause. How lugubrious!
If you want to be demoralized, go to the Novus Ordo.
The parish is Saint Maximilian Kolbe and was the last parish attended by the founder of Knights of Columbus.
It looks fairly conservative. Surely, most of the laity who attend there believe in the Dogma of real presence of Christ in Holy Communion. I’m sure in most liberal parishes, the “faithful” would scoff at this as much as I am but for different reasons.
Can you imagine a more humdrum and almost profane way God could manifest Himself? It’s not cool at all.
What’s even weirder, is that the pastor allegedly couldn’t give Holy Communion because his thumb was bandaged.
The Pastor is Rev. Joseph Crowley of the St Maximilian Kolbe Parish at St Thomas Catholic church in Thomaston, CT. This parish was previously known as St Thomas Parish until a merger and was the last parish served by Blessed Michael McGivney, founder of the Knights of Columbus.
AMDG
It’s like the Loaves & fishes
ReplyDeleteNot surprising, since the whole Novus Ordo Antichurch is a diabolical fraud.
ReplyDeleteI’m going to link this post under my new video entitled:
“Eucharistic Miracles” of the Novus Ordo
I am trying to decide which of the Apostles upon hearing of the Resurrection and then seeing Our Lord standing before them said, "Cool".
ReplyDeleteThat was Fred.
ReplyDeletePeople should distinguish the Mass itself, in whatever Form, from the way some priests celebrate it.
ReplyDeleteThe Mass in whatever form requires the Intention of the priest to Transsubstantiate. Every sacrament needs intention in the part of the priest for it to valid. In the Tridentine Mass the priest is following and reading the required rubrics that expressly state that he is changing bread and wine to Christ's Body and Blood . But it us not the case with the 1969 Pauline Rite.
DeleteYes that's it. Like the sharing of the loaves & fishes. The communicants brought up all the Hosts they had found in, under and around the pews to share with the others.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said:
ReplyDelete"Yes that's it. Like the sharing of the loaves & fishes. The communicants brought up all the Hosts they had found in, under and around the pews to share with the others."
This is a common debating tactic that does not rely upon or claims support from objective fact. It's just assertion without proof and, as such, is shoddy, dishonest and an attempt to politicize the Eucharist.
And you are too thick to know that the person was making a light, hyperbolic reference regarding the lack of reverence toward the Holy Eucharist.
ReplyDelete"And you are too thick to know that the person was making a light, hyperbolic reference regarding the lack of reverence toward the Holy Eucharist.'
ReplyDeleteAdd a gratuitous ad hominem aka 'ad bacculum' plus assumed mind reading and there's the coward's corner routine.
Welcome to the "coward's corner" said Anonymous responding to an observation by Anonymous.
ReplyDeleteGood night.
Love, Anonymous.
I was hoping Gaybrielle was finally past his Boomer-groomer expiration date.
ReplyDelete