I can see from these comments and similar to identical experiences on other sites, that trolls … flying monkeys … have been loosed to infect otherwise interesting comment conversations with inanity, insanity, profanity - a general focus on domination to steer conversation into the ditch.
My own policy from now on is to refrain from responding to anyone who fails to identify themselves with some kind of login name. Anonymous = Troll from now on, as far as I’m concerned.
Some really vile commentary here on your otherwise interesting, challenging blog. They may be AI bots for all I know. Done with ‘em.
If you hang around the comments on this blog for more than 2 minutes, you have seen that they are not for the faint-hearted. So, you have developed a "policy" about responding to commenters? You have too much time on your hands. Next you will be giving us your "Mission Statement".
Don’t be too hard on Aqua. One of his co-bloggers is down on Alcuin Reid and is one of the few Traditionalist bloggers who doesn’t buy the “exoneration” of Cardinal Pell.
James said: “ If you hang around the comments on this blog for more than 2 minutes, you have seen that they are not for the faint-hearted.”
Does that sound Catholic to you?
My “policy” is to stop responding to what are more than likely computer bots. And if there is a real person behind some of these fetid comments, “not for the faint hearted” … not interested in responding/conversing with him or her either.
I've never understood getting upset with "Anonymous" bloggers or commenters. You can tell from the content who/what they are, and ignore them. This site does have an abundance of troll commenters, but isn't that a case of attracting flak because you are over the target? They never argue content, always insult and name calling. So what they call themselves is irrelevant, what they post gives them away. And they all only know one tune.
15 comments:
The ideological straw-clutchers are still at it.
It’s called evidence.
It's ideology tarted up as serious evidence based science. It's Marvel comics stuff.
There’s a science to psychological projection, but it’s not a good basis for objectivity.
"objectivity" What on earth would you know anything about that?
Anyone who doesn’t peddle the orthodoxies of globohomo and fantasies about a new plague can know what that is, Gaybrielle!
Bring outcher dead!
Okay. You refused the "clot shot". You will be fine.
And people who got the shot are going to die. Got it.
You who refused hate these people anyway, so why do you care if they die?
I don’t hate people. Lol, Gaybrielle is an aberrosexual demon, so it’s ok to hate him.
I can see from these comments and similar to identical experiences on other sites, that trolls … flying monkeys … have been loosed to infect otherwise interesting comment conversations with inanity, insanity, profanity - a general focus on domination to steer conversation into the ditch.
My own policy from now on is to refrain from responding to anyone who fails to identify themselves with some kind of login name. Anonymous = Troll from now on, as far as I’m concerned.
Some really vile commentary here on your otherwise interesting, challenging blog. They may be AI bots for all I know. Done with ‘em.
If you hang around the comments on this blog for more than 2 minutes, you have seen that they are not for the faint-hearted.
So, you have developed a "policy" about responding to commenters?
You have too much time on your hands.
Next you will be giving us your "Mission Statement".
Don’t be too hard on Aqua. One of his co-bloggers is down on Alcuin Reid and is one of the few Traditionalist bloggers who doesn’t buy the “exoneration” of Cardinal Pell.
James said: “ If you hang around the comments on this blog for more than 2 minutes, you have seen that they are not for the faint-hearted.”
Does that sound Catholic to you?
My “policy” is to stop responding to what are more than likely computer bots. And if there is a real person behind some of these fetid comments, “not for the faint hearted” … not interested in responding/conversing with him or her either.
Sorry if that offends you.
I doubt you were all that familiar with these comboxes to begin with, tbh.
Aqua,
No worries.
You have never said anything worth being offended over.
I've never understood getting upset with "Anonymous" bloggers or commenters. You can tell from the content who/what they are, and ignore them. This site does have an abundance of troll commenters, but isn't that a case of attracting flak because you are over the target? They never argue content, always insult and name calling. So what they call themselves is irrelevant, what they post gives them away. And they all only know one tune.
Post a Comment