I was a little disappointed by EMJ’s performance, But it sounded a lot better when I listened to it again. He makes some nuanced jabs at Pedo Vausch that are Worth listening to. The chat really eviscerated Vausch.
The debate was something out of "Dorothy's Kansas". EMJ is a debater with class. The other clown was simply a pervert who wanted to express his agenda.---EMJ kept trying to bring the debate back on track. The clown kept interjecting comments to move it toward a brawl. I really don't know why EMJ consented to the "debate". ---The moderator was more of a referee and "barker at a side show" than a serious intellectual. I believe that EMJ did well within a circus atmosphere. This was a lot like inviting Muhammed Ali to wrestle the Undertaker. It was all glib with "Chinese fried rice".
5 comments:
Although, of course, I’m on Jones’s side on this argument, I thought he did a terrible job of arguing about it…
I was a little disappointed by EMJ’s performance,
But it sounded a lot better when I listened to it again. He makes some nuanced jabs at Pedo Vausch that are
Worth listening to. The chat really eviscerated Vausch.
The debate was something out of "Dorothy's Kansas". EMJ is a debater with class. The other clown was simply a pervert who wanted to express his agenda.---EMJ kept trying to bring the debate back on track. The clown kept interjecting comments to move it toward a brawl. I really don't know why EMJ consented to the "debate". ---The moderator was more of a referee and "barker at a side show" than a serious intellectual. I believe that EMJ did well within a circus atmosphere. This was a lot like inviting Muhammed Ali to wrestle the Undertaker. It was all glib with "Chinese fried rice".
Vaush is a wanker!
Vaush is an overgrown fake wanna be intellectual man child.
-Andrew
Post a Comment