The Chauvin jury was programmed by the media that only one verdict was acceptable for the good of the country, so were the people. This is not justice, it is advertising.
Various legal experts (Alan Dershowitz, Jonathan Turkey, Jeannine Piro) all were in agreement that a "change of venue" was in order. The O.J. Simpson trial had a change of venue. There was agreement also that the jury should have been sequestered. It was also discussed on Fox News that there were grounds for an appeal. However, jury tampering and intimidation by such as Maxine Waters and Joe Biden would have to be proven Conjecture is not good enough and you would need a juror to state that he/she was intimidated.---It was pointed out that the jury should have been questioned one by one to see if there was an intimidation factor. This was not done. Therefore, it is next to impossible now to get proof.---It was mentioned that the Minneapolis Star released profiles on each of the jurors. It was conjectured that friends could figure out who they were. A precinct station was burned down and therefore each of their houses was in a similar danger if their identities became known.----This was most likely the right decision. Murder charges are troubling. I believe that manslaughter was an allowable verdict. However, the jury made the decision.
But is Vlad Putin going to relocate to south side Chicago?
ReplyDeleteThe Chauvin jury was programmed by the media that only one verdict was acceptable for the good of the country, so were the people.
ReplyDeleteThis is not justice, it is advertising.
Various legal experts (Alan Dershowitz, Jonathan Turkey, Jeannine Piro) all were in agreement that a "change of venue" was in order. The O.J. Simpson trial had a change of venue. There was agreement also that the jury should have been sequestered. It was also discussed on Fox News that there were grounds for an appeal. However, jury tampering and intimidation by such as Maxine Waters and Joe Biden would have to be proven Conjecture is not good enough and you would need a juror to state that he/she was intimidated.---It was pointed out that the jury should have been questioned one by one to see if there was an intimidation factor. This was not done. Therefore, it is next to impossible now to get proof.---It was mentioned that the Minneapolis Star released profiles on each of the jurors. It was conjectured that friends could figure out who they were. A precinct station was burned down and therefore each of their houses was in a similar danger if their identities became known.----This was most likely the right decision. Murder charges are troubling. I believe that manslaughter was an allowable verdict. However, the jury made the decision.
ReplyDeleteAl Sharpton is not a nice person.
ReplyDelete@Anonymous: I have it on good authority that Al Sharpton gets up every morning and looks in the mirror and says loudly "I am a nice person".
ReplyDelete