Edit: here's my five centavos on this lawsuit against Voris and Company. While I really dislike Voris' biased, untruthful attacks against the SSPX, I am glad that he's trying to help Brother Andre and the Slaves of the Immaculate. It's a shame that the usual suspects are using the corrupt Catholic hierarchy in New Hampshire to attack a ministry they don't like. In an article a commenter left in the comments section of the previous page, the Union Leader, the facetious journalist made a big deal out of the anti-Semitic dispositions of the Saint Benedict Center and Brother Andre, even alleging that the original reconciliation of the Slaves was the result of Brother Francis Maluf renouncing his "anti-Semitism" and removing several articles about the usual suspects from his blog. I refuse to believe that. It's amazing that a tiny religious minority (2% of the population) can bring so much weight down upon a religious organization that dares to criticize it. Clearly, we don't have Freedom of the Press any more where the privileges of a certain Cosmopolitan group come to fore. Anyway, the next time someone asks you to renounce your anti-Semitism, ask them if they'll renounce their anti-Catholicism.
At any rate, doesn't "Father" Georges de Laire's intended lawsuit against Church Militant remind anyone of the time when Basilian, Thomas Rosica, attempted to sue fellow Canadian, traditionalist mincer, Vox Cantoris? This is about as ridiculous on the part of de Laire.
Here's de Laire, mincing to the Gospel lectern. It looked for a moment like he was going to fall at 18:02. But I ask you, how can a man make the charges against the SBC while living a posh lifestyle in his million dollar getaway resort, and tolerating a disrespectful and discraceful "liturgy" like this? It's hard to believe this is supposed to be a Catholic Mass.
Dig enough and some j-- stink wafts up.
ReplyDeleteAsk me if I am surprised.
No.
Thanks for the "anti-semitic" background about the Slaves of Mary.
It was they and their WASP allies who objected most vehemently to Father Leonard Feeney’s Crusade to make America Catholic.
ReplyDeleteThe never wish to look in to the sources of anti-semitism
ReplyDeletehttps://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/tkelly6785757/episodes/2021-02-09T06_23_01-08_00
Traditionalist mincer? What on earth?
ReplyDeleteVox Cantoris is an overexcitable fruitcake who attacks people who are awake on the JQ and AQ. He is a frequent enforcer of political correctness and did I mention that he is also very effeminate?
DeleteUh-oh, Tanc.
ReplyDeleteI see an overexcitable response posted in the near future. LOL !!
Vox wasn't very nice when I was in the hospital close to death from my respiratory problem.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIs this some kind of threat?
DeleteHe’s fair game, since he sets himself up as a moral arbiter of race issues.
Yes, he did make a snotty gay entry in my blog.
@Irenaeus: I would say that your bluff has been called. Amen bro or maybe broessa.
ReplyDelete"the Union Leader, the facetious journalist made a big deal out of the anti-Semitic dispositions of the Saint Benedict Center" what a surprise? given the reaction of the reporter one might think the media and NH is run by super wealthy jews.
ReplyDeleteJudicial Vicar Rev. George de Laire filed a federal lawsuit against the far-right news outlet Church Militant this week, claiming the outlet published “recklessly false” statements about de Laire after a notorious radical sect was disciplined by the New Hampshire diocese.
ReplyDeleteLionel: Simcha Fischer uses a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). Otherwise she would have the same interpretation of Vatican Council II and EENS as 'the radical sect'
________________________
Simcha Fischer, Fr. James Martin sj.,Massimo Faggioli, Michael Sean Winters and John Allen Jr.,agree that without the false premise in the interpretation of Vatican Council II, they would be affirming extra ecclesiam nulla salus like Brother Andre Marie MICM at the St. Benedict Center, New Hampshire, USA
__________________________
Bishop Peter Libasci, the bishop of Manchester, USA his Chancellor and Judicial Vicar and Curia are interpreting Vatican Council II with a false premise and are not telling the truth to Catholics and non Catholics. This is a case for the State Legislature in New Hampshire, Massachusetts and New England,USA
________________________
All the books available on Vatican Council II in the diocese of Manchester, USA have an error.They use irrational reasoning to reject the traditional teaching on the Church having a superiority and exclusiveness in salvation and that in Heaven, there are only Catholics.Bishop Peter Libasci will not correct this mistake and neither will the professionals, associated with the diocese.
The books on Vatican Council II have a mistake and there is no clarification or correction from the Diocese of Manchester or the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
_____________________
Catholic professionals in the diocese must inform Bishop Libasci that LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II do not refer to practical exceptions to EENS. Since they are only hypothetical cases.This is a credibility issue.For a doctor, engineer, lawyer or priest to confuse what is invisible as being being visible, even after being informed, indicates his sense of reality is different from the rest of mankind.
Bishop Peter Libasci and the Chancellor want scientists in New Hampshire, to interpret Vatican Council II by violating Newton's Laws of physics.
The diocese discriminates on the basis of religion; religious beliefs.Those Catholics in the diocese who do not use a false premise and inference, to interpret Vatican by violating Newtons Laws of Physics.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/search?q=Simcha+and+Damien+Fischer