The former Pope Benedict XVI has called same-sex marriage a product of the Antichrist and said society has become so hostile to Christian doctrine that it will shun anyone who opposes equal marriage rights.
The statement comes in a new authorized biography of Benedict by German journalist Peter Seewald. Titled Benedict XVI: The Biography: Volume One, it came out Monday in Germany, the former pope’s native country.
The quote is from an interview Benedict did with Seewald, his frequent collaborator, in 2018. “One hundred years ago, everybody would have considered it to be absurd to speak of a homosexual marriage. Today, one is being excommunicated by society if one opposes it,” he said, according to a translation published in PinkNews.
Even Cardinal Burke isn’t silent.
AMDG
14 comments:
AB Vigano was quoted by Dr. Taylor Marshall. He said that the statement by the Argentinian was designed as the same type of trap used by the Pharisees against Jesus. He was asked about giving to Caesar.---Vigano said that the goal is to create a schism from the right. Bergoglio can then "wave them goodbye" and move on with his liberal minded Church without any interference. This appears to be diabolical.
It means that Pope Francis is an asset of the anti-Christ. This role was given when Jesus said: "Thou art Peter…" and also said:"Before the cock crows thou wilt deny me thrice…" People read His words as if he spoke them otherwise than sub specie æternitatis (under the aspect of eternity). It means follow Peter when he follows Christ. Don't follow him when he follows the anti-Christ. This is happening now in our time. We are most fortunate to see the words of Scriptue being fulfilled. So know that the Second Coming is near and rejoice.
If Francis doctrine is corrective then 2000 years of Christian teaching is wrong. Give me a break! If you are a follower of papal musings about the contemporary world don't simply claim correctness ipse dixit. Tell us why you think its correct. Gays don't have offspring. They stimulate their genetalia and call the bi-product of their stimulation "love." Not the Old Testament nor the New Testament backs up their claim that genital stimulation=s love. Marriage is for the purpose of procreation. It is not just love of the marriage partners that is involved but love of children. The human child needs love to develop. We are to believe pace Pope Francis that genital stimulation =s that love, no? Well perhaps this explains why he kept silent about McCarrick. Perhaps that is why JPII is a saint. The Catholic Church endorsed genital stimulation in childrearing. Those who stimulate the genitals of children are helping them to grow. No natural parents are required. Produce the child from a test tube. Hand it over to genital stimulators and it will develop. Catechesis comes down to this. An amazing idea!
Such a break from natural and Divine Law, and Benedict XVI is still playing like he's on vacation. He could shock the world into understanding the reality of the situation by just coming on strong. The Challenging of the Pope by the Pope Emeritus would be a battle not seen since Lucifer lost the title championship to Michael.
"Today one is excommunicated from society if one opposes approval and legalization of homosexual marriage." Yes in the neurotic first world of the EU and North America. But No in most of the world , including Islamic nations, Red China , India and Russia , Africa (except S Africa) homosexual marriage is illegal and homosexual activity is often treated as a criminal act. However both Popes preside over NuChurch which panders to the neurotic first world population of perverts and porn and drug addicted dysfunctionals.
Klaus Aetnys your comment reflects the bodily region you use for thinking like the vicious people and the pope you seem so ardently bent on defending.
But a true pope cannot be an "asset of the Antichrist"
So, where does that leave us?
reagan's bush: It leaves us in need of a new pope. We'll just have to wait and see what happens next. Vatican I defined papal infallibility, admitting that was one way in which the Church is infallible. The infallibility of the laity was implicit in the definition of the Immaculate Conception, since Pius lX confessed that the testimony of the laity to the truth of this dogma motivated its definition. Then there is the episcopacy. Abruptly adjourned, Vatican l never got to the others modes of infallibility. This of course was fine with the Ultramontanists and was useful for church propaganda as it faced that of the emergent Italian and German nation states. Vatican II was supposed to deepen the question of the scripturally based doctrine of Church's infallibility. However, this never really happened, since John XXlll did not wish his council to be doctrinally oriented. Vatican ll was supposedly pastoral, which is why the present pontiff gives his private opinions. In effect they have the force of dogma but not legally. He does this knowing full well that there is still an active Ultramontanist element in the Church, who focus on papal infallibility independently of any notion that the Pope is only infallible in the context of the entire Church. Hence, he feels himself untouchable because he has the support of papalist devotees and he is acting out of pastoral care for those who wish to make their private fantasies public and share them to create an social identity in a wished for democratic society of pure tolerance.
7:15
Scratching my head. That is where it leaves me.
It is my understanding that the anti-christ will be a Jew.
(I could be incorrect on this.)
Why does Pope Francis always use non-christians to interview him always atheists or Jewish persons.. the guy who made this movie documentary is a homosexual atheistic Jew according to news reports..this is the only Pope that only relies on atheists and Jews to interview him why no Christians... Pope Francis is a disaster to the Catholic Church and he seems to me to be a mainline Protestant lukewarm pseudo-christian.. I pray and imprepacatory prayers against Pope Francis that God will humble him through a calamity or disaster that could cause him to leave the throne of Peter that we may get a new pope
Post a Comment