Bishops Are Desperately Trying to Defend Vatican II
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
AUGUST 11, 2020 If Fr.Hans Kung's books on Vatican Council II need to be removed from the public libraries because of the false premise what about Pope Paul Vi, Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis ? https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/if-frhans-kungs-books-on-vatican.html -------------------
AUGUST 11, 2020 Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit once told me at the Propaganda Fide, Vatican office that the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX was no more relevant.He of course was using the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. So there was a rupture with the Syllabus. If he would not interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise then the suicide bomber in Sri Lanka was outside the Church.He is in Hell today.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/cardinal-malcolm-ranjit-once-told-me-at.html ______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020 All Cardinal Ratzinger/ Pope Benedict's statements and articles on Vatican Council II were with the false premise.So there was a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. Now what do we do ? It's the same with Pope Francis.Andrea Torneilli still does not issue an apology. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/all-cardinal-ratzinger-pope-benedicts.html
______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020 When Fr. Settimo Manelli and Fr. Paulo Siano F.I were the Rector and Vice Rector of the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary at Boccea, Rome they were using the false premise to interpret the Council. Pope Francis closed down the seminary. Fr. Fidenzio Volpi called them 'crypto Lefebvrists'. He did not know about the false premise.He too was using it. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/fr-paulo-siano-fi-were-rector-and-vice.html ______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020 I have been saying that Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and so created a false rupture with Tradition. There has been no denial from the SSPX or any of the Lefebvrists over the years. But none of them admit the truth.None of them state that I am correct. https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/i-have-been-saying-that-archbishop.html -Lionel Andrades
1 comment:
AUGUST 11, 2020
If Fr.Hans Kung's books on Vatican Council II need to be removed from the public libraries because of the false premise what about Pope Paul Vi, Pope John Paul II, Pope Benedict and Pope Francis ?
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/if-frhans-kungs-books-on-vatican.html
-------------------
AUGUST 11, 2020
Cardinal Malcolm Ranjit once told me at the Propaganda Fide, Vatican office that the Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX was no more relevant.He of course was using the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II. So there was a rupture with the Syllabus. If he would not interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise then the suicide bomber in Sri Lanka was outside the Church.He is in Hell today.https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/cardinal-malcolm-ranjit-once-told-me-at.html
______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020
All Cardinal Ratzinger/ Pope Benedict's statements and articles on Vatican Council II were with the false premise.So there was a hermeneutic of rupture with Tradition. Now what do we do ? It's the same with Pope Francis.Andrea Torneilli still does not issue an apology.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/all-cardinal-ratzinger-pope-benedicts.html
______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020
When Fr. Settimo Manelli and Fr. Paulo Siano F.I were the Rector and Vice Rector of the Franciscans of the Immaculate seminary at Boccea, Rome they were using the false premise to interpret the Council. Pope Francis closed down the seminary. Fr. Fidenzio Volpi called them 'crypto Lefebvrists'. He did not know about the false premise.He too was using it.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/fr-paulo-siano-fi-were-rector-and-vice.html
______________________
AUGUST 11, 2020
I have been saying that Archbishop Lefebvre interpreted Vatican Council II with a false premise and so created a false rupture with Tradition. There has been no denial from the SSPX or any of the Lefebvrists over the years. But none of them admit the truth.None of them state that I am correct.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/08/i-have-been-saying-that-archbishop.html
-Lionel Andrades
Post a Comment