Edit: Catholic Snooze Agency doesn't know what to make of Archbishop Carlo Viganò or Trump's praise of him.
[CNA] President Trump on Wednesday tweeted that he was honored by a letter written to him by former apostolic nuncio Archbishop Carlo Viganò, which warned the president against secular and ecclesiastical agents of an atheistic globalist new world order.
The president's tweet is the latest in a series of events that have kept the archbishop in the headlines for much of the last two years, a period in which he has become a polarizing figure in the Catholic Church, and morphed in the public eye from a whistleblowing diplomat to a prognosticator of impending doom amid a spiritual and political battle for world domination.
“So honored by Archbishop Viganò’s incredible letter to me. I hope everyone, religious or not, reads it,” Trump tweeted June 10, linking to Vigano’s recent open letter addressed to the president.Edit: here we have more evidence that Francis is promoting evil Cardinals loyal to him, stacking the deck for further leftist destruction of the Church's structure in future, and the promotion to a key post, of a man who was part of the suite of Secretary of State Cardinal Sodano. What will Spiritual AIDS and his Budghie say? Who cares.
by Archbishop Viganò
WE HAVE JUST been through one of the most disgraceful episodes in which we have seen the prince of lies at work to discredit the book of Pope Benedict XVI and Cardinal Robert Sarah by covering them with vile insults and vulgar insinuations, and the Pope’s jailer, as a judas, now also acting as a hitman.
And once again we find ourselves dealing with another masterpiece of deception: the confirmation by the Pope of the elections of the new Dean and Vice-Dean of the College of Cardinals by the Cardinal-Bishops. This has gone almost unnoticed and yet conceals a devious strategy. It should be borne in mind, in fact, that in June 2018 Pope Francis increased the number of Cardinal-Bishops, which had remained unchanged for centuries, promoting four new ones in one fell swoop. In this way he secured a majority in favor of him, as he has always done with the creation of new members of the College of Cardinals.
To Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, appointed Dean of the College at the age of 86 and therefore excluded from the next conclave, I wish an even longer life than that of his father. But his appointment is a cover for that other more effective appointment — of Cardinal Sandri — which has been prepared ad hoc to pilot the next conclavesecundum Franciscum, that is, according to an updated and augmented edition of the St. Gallen Mafia.AMGD
21 comments:
Is Christine Niles still Voris' spiritual aid?
She acts more like the mom of a gay son or someone who thinks she can convert a homo with 30 minute hugs.
Sorry, but I can’t accept this homophobic content! Even if it’s true!
What a loser.
https://tinyurl.com/yanu9wrt
But you’re a shitlib, of course you’ll reflexively hate Trump’s response to the Bat AIDS whatever it is.
THEY COULD COMMENT ON THIS SUBJECT. IT WOULD HELP THE CHURCH.
Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Lefebvrists are unable to tell the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) that they are using a false premise to interpret Vatican Council II and other magisterial documents. Since Schneider himself inteprets Vatican Council II with the false premise and inference and then does not like the expected conclusion.He then blames the Council and calls for a Syllabus of Errors.
Bishop Schneider like the CDF, wants Brother Andre Marie, MICM, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, N.H, USA to interpret 1) Vatican Council II(LG 8, UR 3, GS 22 etc) 2) the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) 3) the baptism of desire(BOD), baptism of blood(BOB) and invincible ignorance(I.I) 4) Catechism of the Catholic Church n.846 Outside the Church No Salvation 5)Athanasius Creed( all need Catholic faith for salvation) 6) Catechism of Pope Pius X ( 24 Q, 27 Q) 7) Syllabus of Errors of Pope Pius IX ( ecumenism, other religions and salvation) etc with a false premise.
In this way there is a rejection of the traditional teaching on exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
The alleged traditionalist will also be interpreting Quanta Cura, Mystici Corporis etc with the false premise to create a rupture with the Athanasius Creed and EENS. Since wherever BOD,BOB and I.I are mentioned in these texts , he will project them as 1) visible examples of salvation outside the Catholic Church, non Catholics saved without faith and baptism and so they are 2) exceptions to EENS, Syllabus of Errors etc. on exclusive salvation.For me BOD, BOB and I.I refer to hypothetical and theoretical cases only. So Mystici Corporis etc do not contradict Feeneyite EENS.
Bishop Schneider does not make the distinction between invisible-visible,implicit-explicit,subjective-objective and what is unknown and known.
So he supports the CDF which only allows vocations to the religious life, if a candidate, rejects exclusive salvation in the Church by confusing what is invisible as visible, hypothetical as real.
Similarly he expects the Society of St. Pius X(SSPX) to accept Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise, to receive canonical recognition, like the St. Benedict Center, Still River, USA( not to be confused with the community at Richmond ,New Hampshire).
The traditionalists at St. Benedict Center, Still River, where Brother Thomas Augustine MICM is the Prior in the diocese of Worcester, USA,have to condone Vatican Council II interpreted with the false premise by the bishop Robert McManus.So he has granted them canonical recognition approved by the CDF.
If Brother Andre Marie MICM,Prior at SBC, New Hampshire, would interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise and so negate Feeneyite EENS, he too would be approved by the CDF and the diocese of Manchester, where the bishop is Peter Libasci.
The CDF and Bishop Schneider are not asking religious communities to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise.They do not want to offend the Jewish Left rabbis and those who persecute with Leftist laws.
The CDF, Bishop Schneider and Cardinal Braz de Avez want the Franciscans of the Immaculate to interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise to create a rupture with Tradition. They are not telling the Franciscans of the Immaculate to interpret Vatican Council II in continuity with exclusive salvation in the Catholic Church.
Without the false premise there is no theological opening for the new ecumenism and the Christian theology of religious pluralism.
Vigano and Schneider do not comment upon these points. When Vatican Council II is interpreted rationally Ad Gentes 7 says all need faith and baptism for salvation and there are no exceptions to AG 7 mentioned in the text of Vatican Council II.
Presently the CDF and Bishop Schneider accept the Letter of the Holy Office 1949(LOHO) which used a false premise to project BOD and I.I as exceptions to EENS they then overlook the same error in Vatican Council II.-Lionel Andrades
JUNE 13, 2020
The CDF and Bishop Athanasius Schneider support heresy : here is the proof
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/the-cdf-and-bishop-athanasius-schneider.html
Fr.Vigano,when are you completely + emphatically renouncing the V2 documents and Novus Ordo conciliar church?
-Andrew
Also receiving pre-1968 Conditional Consecration by 1
pre-1968 Bishop or Lefevbre,
Thuc,or,Mendez line Bishop.
He will do this sooner or later,
please pray for him.
Anonymous said...
Fr.Vigano,when are you completely + emphatically renouncing the V2 documents and Novus Ordo conciliar church?
-Andrew
Lionel. He has denounced Vatican Council II interperted with the false premise. He is correct here and so is Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
He now has to affirm Vatican Council II interpreted withoiut the false premise which is not a rupture with Tradition.
Also receiving pre-1968 Conditional Consecration by 1
pre-1968 Bishop or Lefevbre,
Thuc,or,Mendez line Bishop.
He will do this sooner or later,
please pray for him.
Lionel: Even the sedes interpret Vatican Council II with the false premise as do the liberals.
They need to issue a correction and admit that they were wrong.
Archbishop Vigano has not done this.
Of course we know that Vatican Council II intepreted irrationally is responsible for the troubles in the Church.No big discovery.
Instead he should have announced tha Vatican Council II can be interpeted without the false premise and it will be in line with Feeneyite EENS.
He needed to affirm EENS with no exceptions, like the missionaries in the 16th century and also Vatican Council II intepreted rationally. Catholics do not know about this and the Lefbvrists want to keep this fact hidden, inspite of being informed about it numerous times.
JUNE 14, 2020
When the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and Bishop Athanasius Schneider use a false premise to create a rupture with the past Magisterium of the Church( before the 1930's), on exclusive salvation with no known exceptions, it is not magisterial. The Holy Spirit cannot make an objective mistake by confusing what is invisible as visible and hypothetical as real
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/when-congregation-for-doctrine-of-faith.html
Fr.Vigano has not renounced
Nostra Aetate nor Lumen Gentium.
He must publicly renounce the "new Mass" & new sacramental rubrics.
Catholics must reject all implementations of the Reformers post 1964,bare minimum.
The 1969 "new Rite of Baptism" removed EVERY exorcism prayer contained in the Catholic Rite of Baptism.
Extreme Unction was so utterly gutted & destroyed to the point it was renamed
"Anointing of the Sick."
Notice the undeniable increase of depravity abomination
effeminancy Idolatry (Assisi 1986) violence pharmekia
abortion Godlessness etc
This new pagan civilization has been unleashed for many reasons, the destruction of Catholicism being one of them.
-Andrew
Have you sent him your Edict, Andrew?
Anonymous said...
Fr.Vigano has not renounced
Nostra Aetate nor Lumen Gentium.
Lionel: He does not have to renoucne either. He simply has to interpret them without the common false premise.They are then in harmony with Tradition( EENS etc).
________________________
He must publicly renounce the "new Mass" & new sacramental rubrics.
Catholics must reject all implementations of the Reformers post 1964,bare minimum.
The 1969 "new Rite of Baptism" removed EVERY exorcism prayer contained in the Catholic Rite of Baptism.
Lionel:
When Vatican Council II is interpreted without the false premise there is no change in the ecclesiology of the Catholic Church. There can be no New Ecumenism, New Theology, New Evangelisation etc.Since there is no known salvation outside the Church.
All the new stuf comes from assuming there is known salvation outside the Church. This 'known salvation' outside the Church comes from confusing LG 8, LG 14, LG 16, NA 2 ,GS 22 etc as refering to visible and personally known non Catholics saved outside the Church.
This is false.They are always invisible for us and invisible non Catholics cannot be objective exceptions to all needing faith and baptism for salvation(AG 7).
Only God can know if any one is saved outside the Church without 'faith and baptism'.We do not and cannot know of a single such case in 1965-2020.
So for me there is nothing in Lumen Gentium, Nostra Aetate etc which contradicts Feeneyite EENS. The Letter of the Holy Office 1949 made an objective error.
_____________________
Extreme Unction was so utterly gutted & destroyed to the point it was renamed
"Anointing of the Sick."
Notice the undeniable increase of depravity abomination
effeminancy Idolatry (Assisi 1986) violence pharmekia
abortion Godlessness etc
This new pagan civilization has been unleashed for many reasons, the destruction of Catholicism being one of them.
Lionel: There is a hermenutic of continuity when Vatican Council II is interpreted witout the false premise. Archbishop Vigano should talk about this.He uses the false premise to interpret Vatican Council II , as does Bishop Athanasius Schneider, and then they both wrongly blame the Council.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith(CDF) is not magisterial on Vatican Council II.
There are two interpretations of the Council and they choose the irrational one. How can the Holy Spirit make an objective error ?
Archbishop Vigano could comment upon this.He supports the non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II. He uses the New Theology to interpret the Council. The New Theology is based upon the false premise and inference.
-Lionel Andrades blog Eucharist and Mission
LEFEBVRISTS ARE CUSHINGITES.
THEY INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS(EENS) WITH CUSHINGISM.
I AM A FEENEYITE. I INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II AND EENS WITH FEENEYISM.
BUT FOR THEM INVISIBLE PEOPLE ARE VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS.SO INVISIBLE CASES OF LG 8, LG 16 ,GS 22 ETC REFER TO VISJBLE AND KNOWN NON CATHOLICS SAVED OUTSIDE THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.THEY CREATE THESE ARTIFICIAL EXCEPTIONS.
FOR ME INVISIBLE CASES OF LG 8, LG 16 ETC CANNOT BE OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS TO EENS. SO FOR ME EENS HAS NO EXCEPTIONS. THERE ARE NONE MENTIONED IN VATICAN COUNCIL II.
BUT FOR ARCHBISHOP VIGANO, BISHOP SCHNEIDER AND THE OTHER LEFEBVRISTS EENS HAS EXCEPTIONS MENTIONED IN VATICAN COUNCIL II.
SO VATICAN COUNCIL II HAS A HERMENEUTIC OF RUPTURE FOR THEM AND ONE OF CONTINUITY FOR ME.
IT IS THE SAME VATICAN COUNCL II BUT WITH TWO INTERPRETATIONS. ONE RATIONAL AND THE OTHER IRRATIONAL.-Lionel
JUNE 16, 2020
Archbishop Vigano could comment upon how he supports the non Magisterial interpretation of Vatican Council II and uses the New Theology to interpret the Council. The New Theology is based upon the false premise and inference.
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/archbishop-vigano-could-comment-upon.html
Council of Trent
Session 7 Canon 13.
For years I've wondered if we'd witness a high profile
conciliar "Bishop" disavow the
Novus Ordo and convert to
Catholicism.
His letters are becoming more + more intense and outspoken when discussing the Revolution and it's repudiation of Catholicism.
One of only a few positive public/social/ecclesiastical
developments since the 80's.
-Andrew
I demand we who attend
Traditional Chapels that hold the sedevacantist opinion be called Thucites.
Sound like a breakaway
Mennonite sect.
-Andrew
Council of Trent
Session 7 Canon 13.
For years I've wondered if we'd witness a high profile
conciliar "Bishop" disavow the
Novus Ordo and convert to
Catholicism.
Lionel:
Archbishop Vigano is still interpreting Vatican Council II like the Thucites and Lefebvrists.
The sedes also need to affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyite.
Presently the sedevacantists like Archbishop Vigano make the mistake of interpreting Vatican Council II with Cushingism. So indirectly they are rejecting EENS ( Feeneyite)-
Lionel Andrades on the blog Eucharist and Mission
His letters are becoming more + more intense and outspoken when discussing the Revolution and it's repudiation of Catholicism.
One of only a few positive public/social/ecclesiastical
developments since the 80's
Lionel: He is still following the theological error of the Lefebvrists and liberals. He is using the New Theology to interpret Vatican Council II. So he has to use a false premise to create a rupture with Tradition(EENS etc).Then he puts the blame on Vatican Council II.
Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre made the same mistake. Sedevacantists like Bishop Pivarunas and Bishop Sanborn and Bishop Dolan follow the error of Archbishop Lefebvre and Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano.
Archbishop Vigano has not yet corrected the mistake. It is the same with Bishop Athanasius Schneider.
So there is no new positive development.
I demand we who attend
Traditional Chapels that hold the sedevacantist opinion be called Thucites.
Lionel: Those who attend Traditional Chapels intepret Vatican Council II like the liberals. The only difference is that they reject the conclusion.
Bot groups need to interpret Vatican Council II with Feeneyism i.e without the false premise and inference. Then they will be aligned with Tradition.
JUNE 17, 2020
Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano wants the St. Benedict Center to fake it ( Graphics )
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2020/06/archbishop-carlo-maria-vigano-wants-st.html
Post a Comment