It was especially hilarious the way he criticized lesbian Attorney General, Dana Nessel as an ineffective leader because she lacks the prudence necessary so that her decisions are unnecessarily draconian.
AMDG
Thursday, April 16, 2020
Covid-19 Uprising
Edit: Jones takes Worst Things commentator, Father Joseph White on his A-historical Thomism. While reading his contribution, I thought Father White sounded a lot like our very own resident Satanist, Gaybrielle, referring to those who are skeptical about the measures being taken during this "epidemic" as "religious narcissists".
It was especially hilarious the way he criticized lesbian Attorney General, Dana Nessel as an ineffective leader because she lacks the prudence necessary so that her decisions are unnecessarily draconian.
AMDG
It was especially hilarious the way he criticized lesbian Attorney General, Dana Nessel as an ineffective leader because she lacks the prudence necessary so that her decisions are unnecessarily draconian.
AMDG
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
19 comments:
Best post since the video of Tay Marshall and Tim Gordon enjoying the end of the world and still no comments.
Thank you for posting.
-Andrew
Father White's First Things essay is a nasty stew of typical Vatican II posturing from the keyboard of a sheltered elitist cleric. If Father White's income vanished indefinitely along with his shelter and pampered way of life because of the draconian Covid 19 dictates of lesbian politicians like Dana Nessel he would not be writing about "rationalized religious narcissism" or "proven time tested procedure." Of course too if Father White thought the Holy Mass, Christ's sacrifice on Calvary and the seven sacraments were the exclusive portals to eternal life he would not be writing for First Things magazine. Even Father White's pompous reference to experts, is a straw man, since the nice thing about experts is that there are so many of them, as every NYC personal injury and medical malpractice lawyer knows. Swedish epidemiologist Johan Giesecke claims that the Covid 19 lock downs all lack a solid evidentiary basis. Comparisons between lock down states and non lock down states in the US fail to reveal any health benefits from policies that are turning a large segment of Americans into economic beggars.
I found an interesting interview on the internet related to Pope John Paul I, Alberto Luciani. Sept 6, 1978, Firing Line with William F. Buckley. Malachi Martin was the guest. The tape is for 59 minutes.----Martin absolutely gushes over Luciani. Luciani was elected on 26 August and was deceased by 28 September after just 33 days. The view on Luciani is very positive.----Martin says that the top candidate is already selected before the conclave. His group goes into the conclave with a "policy statement" which is handed out to the other cardinals. Once they are elected, each cardinal swears support for the policy.----Stefan Wychinski of Poland was the leader and in a coalition of a number of German cardinals. Martin states that the French were out and out Communists. Luciani comes across as an incredible man.---There were questions from Jeff Greenfield in regard to Communism. Martin was very plain in stating that Marxism was just not acceptable because of efforts to "extirpate" religion. He stated that various cardinals were giving monetary support for the training of Marxist guerillas to overthrow countries in South America.---The basic philosophy of Alberto Luciani who was described as a charismatic leader was the "inspiration of leadership". His belief was that you take a corrupt leader like Somoza of Nicaragua and put the pressure of his faith on him to transform society. Again, Marxism was just not acceptable.----The leadership of the Christ Himself was to inspire 12 special followers. Luciani appeared to be "cut from the same cloth". According to Martin, it was known that Luciani would push for a strict interpretation of morality.----After 33 days, the light of reform went out. Later statements by Martin were very explicit in a claim that Luciani had been assassinated. Without a doubt, Luciani was very charismatic and was the "chosen one" for reform of the Church. His beliefs were similar to those of Giuseppe Cardinal Siri who had been elected in 1958 according to Martin and who then abdicated as Gregory XVII after being handed a note where he and his family had been physically threatened.---Martin stated that problems in the Church were directly related to Paul VI. He stated that Paul lost his faith and then recovered it shortly before his death. He really liked John XXIII and remarked that it was unfortunate that his reign was so short.
Anyone who great up with Irish bullshit artists wouldn't take Malachi seriously.
See, you’re persistent. UK benefits should be reduced in future so you lieabouts don’t have as much time to waste.
@JBQ George de Nantes spoke highly of him also.
Fr.Gommar DePauw swore that Bp.Luciani personally called him to work on a panel that was planning on making the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass mandatory in all parishes circa 1978.
He 'died' a week or so later.
-Andrew
Pope John Paul I has the nickname "the Smiling Pope", and because of that, many liberals and radicals claimed (incorrectly), that he would be a radical....like Francis. In fact, he was the opposite. He was much like Cardinal Siri, except perhaps not as strident. He had an appreciation for the traditions of the Church, and the Mass, and was inclined to favor the Tridentine Latin Mass over the Novus Ordo. But he would not have abolished the Novus Ordo. He also disliked lay-clothes nuns.
We will never know what he really would have been like.....other than he would not have been the radical the liberals paint him as.
Damian M. Malliapalli
Benedict XVI should never have resigned.....failing health or no. He just turned 93 and would have reached the age Leo XIII lived to see. He would have just celebrated this coming week 15 years as Pope! Can you imaging what great things he might have done in the last 7 years? The Patriarch of Venice, and the great Archbishop CHaput of Philadelphia would be cardinals by now, the TLM probably would have been made mandatory in every parish along side the N.O., the priesthood and seminaries would be more orthodox. By now he might have even brought back the Papal Tiara for Christmas and Easter....though I doubt it. But he was going to bring back the Sedia Gestatoria, not only for traditional reasons of Papal ceremonies and audiences, but also (like now Francis), he has very bad artheritis in his knees. Francis also has sciatica.
Damian M. Malliapalli
Fr.DePauw was told the Novus Ordo missal would be abolished within a year.
-Anthony
We win in the end, but Neo-cons like Chaput aren't going to help
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TFTl1jG6Y4&t=
It's very probable Bp.Luciani would've brought back the traditional rite of Holy Orders according to Fr.DePauw who talked with him personally.
E. Michael Jones gets so much right, especially on the JQ. That being said, he is borderline retarded on race. He is correct about the (((Termites))) and WASPs teaming up to destroy Catholic Neighborhoods, but he leaves out the damage done by Catholic Clergy. Case in point, when the federal government mandated that South Boston Schools had to be "enriched", the archdiocese of Boston put a moratorium on parochial school construction. This is how the Catholic Church rewards working class Whites.
Jones is totally spot on about Lesbians not being good leaders. He is to be commended for red pilling vast numbers of Libertarians/Conservatives about Usury and Sodomy going hand in-hand.
Sins lead us to addictions and slavery of thinking and living.
We see life as not so bad in life, when,in fact, you are compromising, while others as irrevocably evil. Mercy to others becomes the compromise you concede to yourself and your sins, rather than good and evil objectively.
The Catholic Hierarchy has done the same, by rejecting objective good and evil, and replacing it with the compromises it concedes to itself, on such things as drugs, sodomy, money laundering,and worship of false gods.
@"anonymous": Father DePauw was somewhat odd; An Americanist, and an ardent adversary of the SSPX;His chapel was run a bit like a cult. Opposing the mainstream and the SSPX, and people attending the chapel were often afraid to make even a constructive criticism; it felt like outside the Ave Maria Chapel there was no Salvation. One of the things I disagreed about was his often use of "general absolution" when he could not finish his confessions on time.(Because other parishes were either too liberal and others in schism to trust going to confession to). In his defense, I will say that he gave excellent sermons, and knew his Latin (pre-1962) Tridentine Mass to perfection and said the Mass with so much solemnity and heart.
DePauw was very fond of Spellman. I guess you take your friends where you can find them!
Fr.DePauw wasn't perfect but no one is,please Pray for his Soul.
-Andrew
Post a Comment