Images are emerging of a Greek Orthodox church in Lesvos which was vandalised by refugees.
On Monday, more than 500 refugees grouped together to head down to the port of Mytilini from Moria camp.
The group were confronted by members of MAT (Tactical Police) along the way, and resorted to stoning the Greek authorities in order to continue in their journey, only to be met with chemical and flash grenades.
Residents on Lesvos remain united and are trying to maintain a strong front against the situation unfolding on their island.
AMDG
There are reports today of trouble on the border between Turkey and Greece. The Greeks used gas to disperse the refugees who tried to storm their way across the border. As someone who has been to Istanbul through the Bosphous on our way to the Black Sea aboard a U.S. frigate, I can tell you that the Turks had bayonets at their backs.---This is a new type of warfare and Pope Francis is right in the middle of this mass movement of refugees to fulfill a political agenda.
ReplyDeleteThe Pope is a narrow mind from a local barrio mentality. The usual white trash in a white trash neighborhood. He has no universal view of the whole picture, but merely the parochial mind of what he has experienced and the smell of his uncouth unwashed understanding of what is just of the most immediate understanding and immediate gratification.He understands only on the level of greed and sex as basic human needs that cannot be lived without.
ReplyDeleteCardinal Parolin, however, he is a cunning snake with the big, long term view.
"He is a cunning snake with the big, long term view". There are plenty of issues with "unbridled capitalism". However, that is just a "smoke screen" for that long term agenda. There is not an economic issue anywhere in ?Amoris Laetitia". It is all about a change in an interpretation of morality. This sea change in morality is overthrowing 2000 years of Church tradition to go with millennia seen in the Old Testament.
ReplyDelete@Jbq I was not referring to Cardinal Parolin as a supporter of "unbridled capitalism". Rather, was saying that Cardinal Parolin is the "man behind the throne",as successor of Sodano, to plan the long-term goals and approach of the Great Apostasy in leading the Church to abandon Christianity and replace it for the New World Order. I would find it believable if it turned out Parolin was a 33rd degree Mason.
ReplyDelete"It is all about a change in an interpretation of morality. This sea change in morality is overthrowing 2000 years of Church tradition to go with millennia seen in the Old Testament."
ReplyDeleteShow the evidence, otherwise one could assume that your assertion is just that, a collection of unsupported claims. But then, it's so much less messy than having to back up allegations with proof.
@Constantine: As an anti socialist, Parolin is anything but a supporter of "capitalism". Sorry about any confusion. Francis is a Marxist just as his designated director of the Jesuits, Arturo Sosa who has voiced such. Actually, the duties of the defense of the faith has been moved to the auspices of the Secretary of State.----Parolin has now been labeled by such as Dr. Taylor Marshall in his interview with Christopher Ferrara as a "vice pope or prime minister". Issues involving the Third Secret are now under the control of the office of the secretary of state.
ReplyDelete@PW: Isn't that what an interpretation of "Amoris Laetitia" actually says? There is a redefining of adultery, fornication, and sodomy. A large number of qualified individuals have classified this exhortation as heresy pure and simple. It sure as L isn't traditional morality now is it?
ReplyDeleteLol, like a true Communist.
ReplyDeleteThe existence of people like Peter Watson aka Gaybrielle in positions of power is a sign of how bad things are in the church. People who are thoroughly rationalist, illuminist and evil are in power.
Tancred, tell that to someone who is accused with an offence by another who has no substantiating evidence. Or, does allegation without evidence constitute your idea of a just legal system?
ReplyDeleteJBQ,
ReplyDeleteYour loaded rhetorical questions betray your insecurity. You constantly confuse assertion, opinion, gossip with fact and verifiable evidence that would satisfy the demands of both civil and divine justice.
@PW: So say you. I hope that you find your way.
ReplyDeleteLots of evidence. Just look at all the sodomites who pay lip service to Globohomo and rush to prostrate themselves before Jewish power whoever and whenever it asserts itself.
ReplyDeleteJBQ has evaporated in a fit of pique and you, Tancred, either refuse or are incapable of acknowledging the fact that assertions of wrong doing must, according to the laws of natural and divine justice, be supported with credible evidence.
ReplyDeleteChanging the topic to the default anti-jewish narrative demonstrates, I think, speaks volumes about what really drives you and your mates.
The airing of your concerns about who the enemies of the Church are tells me all I need to know about what kind of lowlife you are.
ReplyDeleteIm guessing a retired professor, if not a demobbed hairdresser, at Notre Flame or crusty gay priest who logs in at the University library. Just loves La Cage Aux Falles! Absolutely fabulous!
You are simply demonstrating that you are unwilling to address the question I put to you: are the demands of natural and divine justice sufficiently met by a raft of unsupported assertions, 'wink-wink-nudge-nudges', ad hominem arguments and ambit sprays.
ReplyDeleteAs long as you refuse to engage responsibly, then the wider, silent readership who constantly monitor this blog will understandably keep on thinking that cafeteria Catholicism and moral relativism are the eponymous flowers of this blog.
Surprise you fiends with a rational response.
DeleteYou don’t get to pose questions.
It would be one thing if you identified yourself, but since you are habitually routed from the field like a steppes bandit and refuse to comport yourself like a
civilized Christian, I am amused you that believe you can sashay in here, thinking you deserve a hearing for your antiquated, musty, obscurantist gay antique collector views.
QED.
ReplyDeleteDeclaring victory for yourself again? Awwwww
ReplyDeleteQED x 2
ReplyDeleteThe Novus Ordo sect is )ewish power.
ReplyDeleteOur Holy Sacrifice of the Mass,
Sacraments,and our Apostolic Holy Week pre-1951/1955 were destroyed in order to accommodate and submit to our
)ewish anti-Christ overlords.
Obviously, you make a valid point. I would ask you if this is an accommodation for the Jewish religion or for Jewish ethnicity? There is a big difference between those of the Jewish faith and those who are Bolsheviks.--Uncle Joe (not Biden) but Stalin, was an Orthodox seminarian with a Jewish background. No matter the truth, he became an atheist. We now have the pontiff looking to an atheist journalist (Scalfari) for support and definition. Atheism is alive and well in the Catholic Church reform movement.---If you read the description of the A.C. by Fulton J. Sheen, there is a key phrase in his description. "He will have a secret which no one will know". He will not believe in God. --- We already have a Marxist pontiff who has declared allegedly through Scalfari that the Christ was not God and merely a man. This pretty much profiles the Arian heresy of which 85% of the bishops evidently supported. This entire synopsis is shaping up in the fine print of the Gospel. ---Sister Lucia stated that the Third Secret is found in the Apocalypse. Events are rounding into shape. The characters are defined and Shakespeare is on the case. The divine architect appears to be watching closely as events unfold.
ReplyDeletePope Leo XIII stated it's absurd to believe he who doesn't have the faith can command and rule the Church.(Satis Cognitum 1896)
Delete-Andrew
I agree and second the comments made by "JBQ".
ReplyDeleteI have always stated that "Jew" is not an appropriate term. It rashly describes a person or person as all the same as with brush of paint. I have always preferred the use of the more precise words: Hebrew, or Talmudist, or Zionist, to describe.
Ask you to read this, and tell me who wrote it?
"But at root the desecration is a symptom of far greater evils. It is a symptom of all the materialist rejections of the Divine that have plagued our people over the last two centuries. This rejection has spawned the evil of Zionism with its rejection of the Divine plan of exile and redemption and its cruelty and arrogance towards other nations.
Without the light and true kindness of Torah there will be, Heaven forbid, rebellion and cruelty and, yes, perversion."
It could have been written by a Traditionalist Catholic.
You may be surprised it is from here:
https://www.nkusa.org/activities/Statements/2006Nov9.cfm
Written by 'a Traditional Catholic'! Tancred, Himmler, Ray Burke, Malachi Martin?
ReplyDelete@"Pw": So now you insult Hebrew people who follow the Old Covenant too. You need to see a headshrinker. And go to a good confessor for help.
ReplyDeleteAnother combo sandwich of eisegesis and moralizing ululation.
ReplyDelete@"pw" beware: your thinking has been condemned by both the people of the Old Law and the New Law. Islam won't be much help to your thinking either. When you die you can't say to God "Oh how could I have known". There is invincible ignorance or excuse that you were not given a chance to know you were wrong. You are standing without any incomplete or false faith to pretend for you. You don't love us or any others that do not suit you. You only want the satisfaction of wanting to win an argument. But this is not a win. You lose your immortal soul. I and Im sure others here too speak on this website out of love for you and sadness in your risking your soul to eternal damnation and loss of God in your life. You only hurt yourself by answering with smart-alecky comments. I ask that all of us here on this website and in your life to ask Mary conceived without sin Immaculate to intercede for you and cure you of your illness.
ReplyDelete".....take the plank out of your own eye first, then..."
ReplyDelete- Jesus Christ
@"PW": now you rashly accuse your brother of having greater faults. I am judging your public faults publicly admitted, but not publicly apologized for. There may be more sins of which I do not speak of because you have not made them public. But public sins require a public apology as first step to atonement. A practicing sodomite may only need to privately apologize to God and those he scandalized. A sodomite poltical activist requires a public admission to guilt and sorrow and repentance.
ReplyDeleteGet help.
ReplyDeleteJust so "PW" knows, a "plank" cannot fit in anyone's eye. Nevertheless, it very well could fit up part of his anatomy.
ReplyDelete