Monday, August 12, 2019

Jews Wondering Why Catholics Aren’t Trying to Destroy Each Other

Edit: Dexter Van Zile is wondering why Catholic bloggers won’t attack other Catholic bloggers who make the Jews angry and question their influence on various aspects of culture, politics and religion.  While most of the bishops in the modern Church espouse abhorrent liberal opinions on religion in contradiction to what Catholics believe all across the spectrum, some commentators are worried about things which aren’t even articles of faith... in fact, the positions they hold themselves aren’t even Catholic. Just look at the Judaizing  product of the gay seminary system of the 70s, Bishop Frederick Campbell. (Some may remember when +Campbell attacked a Catholic answers commentator for saying the Jewish covenant isn’t salvific.) So, here we have people, calling themselves Catholic, attacking other Catholics for not anathematizing other Catholics for holding Catholic positions. Crazy!

Dexter van Zile writes for The Times of Israel and describes himself as a Christian Media Analyst. It’s unclear from browsing his online contributions if he’s a Christian who comments or someone who just targets Christians who offend or challenge Jewish supremacy.

[From the Supreme Neoconservative Blog Magisterium] Patrick Coffin, a prominent Catholic commentator, wants us to believe that the image of super-intelligent and uber-aware commentator that he has presented in scores of videos over the past decade is not who he really is. He made this clear last week in a “Tweet” he posted in response to an article about E. Michael Jones, a notorious theological antisemite whom Coffin has fawningly interviewed three times on his podcast “Coffin Nation” since August 2018. During his appearances, Jones has spoken about horror movies, the decadence of modern architecture, and Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign.
In response to the article, which declared that Catholic YouTubers (like Coffin) who have Jones on their shows “should be ashamed of themselves,” Coffin responded defensively, declaring, “Sure, I’m supposed to know about and agree with 100 percent of every past statement made by every guest I have on—and I certainly must agree with your take. Kindly go away.”
Coffin suggests that he was somehow unaware of Jones’s anti-Jewish animus, and that even if he did know about these statements, it would be OK for Jones to appear on Coffin Nation because he didn’t “agree” with Jones’s antisemitism.
AMDG

43 comments:

  1. That "anti-Semite" noise is identical to the "raaaaaaaaaaaycisss!!" noise we hear all day every day. Jones is edgy, but everything he says is true. No different than saying that Baltimore is disgusting.

    Oh, well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Addendum: one will NEVER hear a Jew decry the Jews who invented and run the porn industry, nor the Jews who push Marxism all day long in this country.

    Never.

    Just sayin'....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Best comment I've read in past 30 days!
      _Andrew

      Delete
  3. Jesus, Mary, Joseph, the Apostles and most of the early Christians for over the first hundred and fifty years were Jews.
    The Ten Commandments came from God through the Jewish people.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @ the "Mr.Peter Watson" : Jesus,Mary and Joseph and Apostles" were not "Jewish". They were Hebrew and they were Israelites. There never was a religion called "Judiasm" until it was coined by St. Paul to mean hebrew opposers and persecutors of the New Covenant. Of course, they were generally over time, adopting Talmudic writings that contradict or show inconsistencies or develop distictively from the religion of the Israelites before Christ. Ancient Israelites had a priesthood, a Sacrifice, and a Pope (aka "High priest".) Which would offer in atonement for the sins of the people, something most who practice what they call "Judiasm" consider umimportant or irrelevant in their life, and not as important as hating Christ.0p

      Delete
  4. Alshually, you might remember when the late Father Paul Marx cited a Rabbi who said that the Jews were prominent in the abortion industry, and all the screeching monkeys were summoned, including that dingbat attorney hired by Archbishop John Nienstedt, Jennifer Haselberger.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You need to do better than this Constantine. Get out your Hebrew Bible and look up:
    2 Kings 16:6 'yehudim' (the Jews)
    2 Chronicles 32: 18 'yehudim' (the Jews)
    Jeremiah 34:9 'yehudi' (a Jew)
    Esher 5: 17 'yehudim' (Jews)

    I believe these texts predate Paul.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We don't use The "Hebrew Bible"; the intelligent Hebrews of the time used the Greek Bible, because Greek was the language if the intelligent. And the Hebrew Bible is translated and used by Protestants.

      Delete
  6. And bad spelling on your part. If you're going to be a clever dick at least attempt to look as though you know what you are talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Peter Watson: I actually read your discussion on the abortion controversy. It made sense. You are extremely well educated. However, your previous comment using the "d" word destroys any semblance of credibility.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Christ said that he "came not to destroy the Old Law but to fulfill it". Leon Trotsky and the Bolshevik bois certainly had a Jewish background. Joseph Stalin allegedly did also and intentionally infiltrated the Orthodox priesthood to see how they thought with plans for future destruction.---The devil was in Bolshevism just as the occult drove the Nazis. There are definitely Bolsheviks involved in the far left in the U.S. So, E. Michael Jones has a point.

    ReplyDelete
  9. JBQ, Peter Wilson has loads of discredibility. The only thing which might lend him credibility is his use of local idioms.

    ReplyDelete
  10. YAWN!
    Another Jew offended. Whine with dinner anyone?

    ReplyDelete
  11. After removing Fr. John Paul Echert from a tenured position, Campbell was rewarded by being made bishop of a gay diocese.
    https://www.foxnews.com/us/lesbian-teacher-ohio-diocese-settle-over-firing-teacher-will-not-get-job-back

    Echert drifted into obscurity and now runs the lay Catholic Argument Club/Diner in Duluth.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Duluth? I’m pretty sure they shut that down because of a health department inspection.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Oh really? Too bad. I was planning to visit
    next Summer. I heard they sold lutefisk marmalade. Does he still podcast?
    Did Fr. z turn on him?

    Is he laicozed?

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Sybarite Zuhlsdorf turns on anyone who either catches him out on the scam or won't provide a kick back.

    ReplyDelete
  15. You’re just jealous you lack his talent and good nature.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Z’s best work is feeding birds 🐦 and taking pictures of food. 🥘

    ReplyDelete
  17. The followers of crass materialist, Zuhlsdorf pander to and fund his sine-cure, rump-fed existence that he constantly claims as his right and entitlement. Sadly for the grovelling supporters, they fail to recognize the underlying contempt Zuhlsdorf has for them all.

    ReplyDelete
  18. No but Zuhlsdorf's bug-eyed, naïve and supine supporters are. The guy is a fraud.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I know him personally, and I really dislike him, but you don’t have anything on him but your own malice and envy.

    I sense a little professional resentment from a much less talented cleric.

    ReplyDelete
  20. What haunts him most of all is the strong possibility that he'll get a call from a higher authority directing him to return to his diocese of incardination in Rome. Those who have protected him with their patronage have either died or are loosing influence. Zuhlsdorf is a sine cure mendicant on the run from a murky past, living it up on presumptuously the donor's dime and growing more and more obese by the minute and not just physically so. He's a self-absorbed faker whose scamming trip is coming to an end. The furtive glances, the tick and twitches are a give away.
    I am please to learn that you dislike him. He is a very toxic piece of work.

    ReplyDelete
  21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  22. He seems to have the hots for seminarians and 'young priests.' He really gets his jollies up when he talks about them and birettas in the same breath.

    ReplyDelete
  23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  24. I bet they have never seen a scam like it nor have the priests incardinated into Madison who are on a fraction of what this out of town, sine-cure grifter rakes in from the gullible brown nosers.

    ReplyDelete
  25. When he was incardinated in Rome, you criticized him, and now you’re still playing that old card that he’s incardinated in Madison.

    Trying to take shots at him for being “out of town” is also a little rich since the Zuhlsdorfs have been farming Wisconsin for well on 150 years.

    It’s funny how you go from attacking people for ad hominems in one post, and then doing them yourself in a another, but adding slander...


    ReplyDelete

  26. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

  27. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yep, your libelous comments had to go.

    ReplyDelete
  29. The Pravda default position.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bergoglio never censors those who challenge him.

      Delete
  30. That's correct, Pope Francis never does but you lower the boom just as soon as you realize that you have painted yourself into a corner. Heady stuff and so 'bella figura.'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is just one example of many others where Catholic publications and individuals are hounded and destroyed by litigious Vatican officials in the defense of Bergoglio and his regime.

      http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2018/03/vatican-enlists-lavender-law-firm-to.html?m=1

      Delete