(Rome) Fr. Joseph Fessio and Mark Bromley, as representatives of Ignatius Press, have published a video statement in which they ask Rome to respond to the Open Letter of Catholic Intellectuals.
On April 30th, an international group of Catholic intellectuals published an open letter. The detailed document raises detailed heresy allegations against Pope Francis. There has never been anything like this in Church history.
Rome has reacted with silence so far.
The document has since been signed by other personalities. They address the letter to all Catholic bishops in the world with a call to examine the allegations of heresy contained in the document. Anyone who concludes that the allegations are justified, says the appeal, should be active.
The US Jesuit P. Joseph Fessio is a student of Joseph Ratzinger, from whom he received his doctorate at the University of Regensburg in 1975. In 1978, he founded the publishing house Ignatius Press in San Francisco, which became the most important Catholic publishing house in the United States.
Together with Mark Bromley, he spoke as a representative of the publishing house in a video to open letter Catholic intellectuals to word, which was published by LifeSiteNews.
They ask the Vatican not to ignore the open letter, but to comment on the allegations. In the video, P. Fessio describes the Open Letter as an "important document".
To unpleasant writings and requests, such as the 2016 Dubia of four cardinals, the Correctio filialis of 2017 or the Viganò dossier of the former Apostolic Nuncio in the United States, Francis has neglected of an answer.
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Bild: Ignatius Press/LifeSiteNews
AMDG
ReplyDeleteMay 6, 2019
These points on faith and salvation were not covered by the Open Letter to the Bishops. They can still be studied and announced.
...1 .
Now the signatories of the Open Letter have the text of Vatican Council II before them. The Council can be interpreted in harmony with EENS and the past ecclesiology or as a rupture. It depends upon how we interpret hypothetical cases.If LG 8, LG 16 etc refer to known or unknown people in the present times, decides the conclusion.
For the two popes LG 8 etc refer to personally known people and so there is a rupture with Tradition( EENS, Syllabus of Errors).
This is heresy and it is not denied by the two popes.
The heresy is there in two theological papers of the International Theological Society and it can be read in black and white.(See the right hand bar for details).So we have the evidence. We have the proof.
2.
With personally visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I the present two popes interpret the Nicene Creed to mean,'I believe in three or more known baptisms, desire, blood and invincible ignorance... and they exclude the baptism of water in the Catholic Church'. This is first class heresy.We cannot change the understanding of the Nicene Creed.The whole Church now has to repeat the new interpretation of the Nicene Creed.
3.
So we have a false new theology created at Vatican Council II with alleged physically visible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I.Then this irrationality is applied to traditional extra ecclesiam nulla salus(EENS). So there is no more the strict interpretation of EENS but EENS with BOD, BOB and I.I being exceptions. Now even GS 22, UR 2, NA 2 etc are interpreted as literal exceptions.
Pope Benedict confirmed that EENS was no more the same as it was for the missionaries in the 16th century(Avvenire, March 2016). He said there was ' a development' with Vatican Council II. Of course he means Vatican Council II with LG 8, LG 14, LG 16 etc being exceptions to EENS.
So the faith - teachings have been changed on EENS and the Nicene Creed by assuming invisible cases of BOD, BOB and I.I and LG 8 etc are not invisible but are objective exceptions to EENS.
This has also given a new meaning to the Apostles Creed and the Profession of Faith (See the right hand bar for details). The Catechism of Pope Pius X would conradict itself. It says all need to be members of the Catholic Church for salvation and also mentions invincible( which is visible for the popes and the CDF).This is modernism.
This is not denied by the two popes.
For example when Pope Benedict said that EENS was no more like it was for the missionaries in the 16th century he could have said, "EENS TODAY IS THE SAME AS IN THE 16TH CENTURY SINCE THERE ARE NO EXCEPTIONS TO EENS IN VATICAN COUNCIL II".
- Lionel Andrades
Continued
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/these-points-on-faith-and-salvation.html
May 6, 2019
The two popes have made a theological mistake.The evidence is now out
https://eucharistandmission.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-two-popes-have-made-theological.html
There are two chances that there will be a response. They would be little and none.
ReplyDelete