Flavio Mendoza with dog and son (whom he had artificially inseminated and for 130.000 Dollars, carried to term by a “surrogate mother.”)
(Buenos Aires) One of the most famous and richest aberrosexuals in Argentina had his child baptized in the Cathedral of Buenos Aires. The child was born for payment by a "surrogate mother".
The 43-year-old aberrosexual ballet dancer, choreographer and artistic director Flavio Mendoza can not naturally have children because of the lifestyle he has chosen. In order to fulfill his "wish" nevertheless, he had a "surrogate mother" deliver an in vitro fathered child: a son.
He had the child who was born in April baptized in the Cathedral of Buenos Aires and made the christening a "Mendoza show". His current aberrosexuals partner, 32-year-old Daniel Allodi, appeared by his side.
The "surrogate motherhood", inappropriate because it is a euphemistic term, is said to have cost Mendoza $ 130,000.
The weekly Caras, a paper of the rainbow press, placed the baptism in its current issue on the front page. Caras was the only newspaper that Mendoza allowed to photograph during baptism.
The baptism was performed by the priest Alejandro Russo. In the Caras article Mendoza confirms that the child was artificially conceived and paid for as a "surrogate mother."
"God has blessed and enlightened my son," Mendoza is quoted, who also used his statements for aberrosexual propaganda. It was "impressive to experience this moment as a gay man," because according to social conventions, no one thought that he could become a father.
"Being able to hold my baby in my hands with the help of a spare belly was the best reward of my life."
For the church, such baptisms are not without problems, because they are bring the public’s attention to advertising events for homosexuality. But this is counted by the Catholic Church an a blasphemous sin.
Already in the spring of 2014, the baptism of an artificially conceived child for a lesbian mother in the Cathedral of Cordoba caused a sensation.
In both cases, the Church behaved according to the ostrich head in the sand, principle. The head was stuck in the sand and they pretended that it was a baptism like others. One could also speak of the behavior of a service provider. The baptism of the child is for the Church. Nevertheless, she can not exclude the environment and the context. Certainly she can not let herself and the baptism sacrament be misused for aberrosexual propaganda.
Already in Cordoba there had been criticism that for the cathedral was made available for the baptism. It could have taken place in a small chapel and been closed to the public.
In 2014, Argentina's President Cristina Kirchner had used her role as a godmother to politically promote aberrosexuality. In Cordoba, as in Buenos Aires, there was no clear explanation of the Church teaching on aberrosexuality that would have to be associated with the baptisms in order to avoid misunderstandings.
It happened another way in another case and also in Argentina. The successor of Kirchner, the acting president Mauro Macri was denied sponsorship of a baptized as a remarried divorced. It would be all the easier if there were no prohibitions to be pronounced, but "only" to affir Church doctrine.
Text: Giuseppe Ardi
Image: Caras (screenshot)
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG
8 comments:
The Church has lost all relevance just as stated in the alleged Third Secret.
Seems you left out first sodomite baptism that occurred while Bergoglio was still there:
Homosexual ceremony in a Basilica of Buenos Aires
The elegant Basilica of the Most Holy Sacrament, where perpetual adoration takes place, is one of the preferred churches in Buenos Aires, Argentina, for marriages and ceremonies of high society. On August 25, 2012, the church was the stage for a sequence of scandals.
Homosexual Roberto Carlos Trinidad submitted himself to surgeries to change his sex and became "Florencia" Trinidad, above at left in the white dress. He/she has lived with another man, Pablo Goycochea, for more than a decade. "Florencia" is a TV star in several series on Telefe - Channel 11 on Buenos Aires television. Some time ago, the homosexual couple adopted (purchased) two children born on the same day from a clinic that does artificial insemination in San Diego, California.
On the first birthday of the "twins," "Florencia" and her partner decided to have the children baptized. The Catholic religious authorities found nothing better to do than give permission for the ceremony to be performed at the Basilica of the Most Holy Sacrament. This is not to say that those children should not be baptized; the point at hand is that these baptisms should never have been publicly celebrated as an exaltation of homosexuality, as indeed it was.
Thus, after reportedly giving Communion to the homosexual couple, Fr. Jorge Garcia Cuerva, above center, officiated with all pomp and circumstance at the ceremony of Baptism. How can one not see in this broadly publicized event a blatant support of the Catholic Church for homosexual "marriage" and change-of-sexes surgeries?
First row below left, "Florencia" with the two children; at right, posing with his/her partner in front of the Altar. Second row, with the Godparents of both children. Last row, façade and interior of the Basilica del Santisimo Sacramento in Buenos Aires.
https://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A487-BsAs-Homo.htm
Somebody helped me when I was helping Rorate Against the attacks from Neocons and the bumptious Shea and the evil Simcha Fischer...
http://eponymousflower.blogspot.com/2013/03/pope-francis-brighter-portrait.html?m=1
I'm sure Pope Francis would applaud this, receive the queer in audience, embrace him and the bought and paid for child, and launch into one of his speeches about how wonderful this is.
He say " After all who am I to judge?"
Damian Malliapalli
How sad that the general integrity and trust that bishops and cardinals enjoyed under Pope Benedict xvi has been destroyed by the anti Pope Francis.
No doubt a few good men still exist in the respective colleges but Bergoglio has done his Masonic duty successfully and it's merely a matter of time until a greater corrosion and destruction of the visible fabric of the church ensues.
Unless some bishops and cardinals make a stand and put an end to this destructive anti papacy of Francis.
The previous comment is very insightful. It would appear that Pope Francis is only a lull on the road to even more progressivism. Malachi Martin wrote that a future pope would destroy the papacy. This was before his death in 1999 and the election of this pontiff in 2013.
Rome lost the faith,soon it will end,keep praying the Rosaries,Our only weapons to helps us again the spirit of Darkness, Dear God,Blessed Mother, St Joseph and all the St in heaven pray for us in this Battle again the Prince of Darkness.
Despite Malachy Martin and some of his predictions coming true, I donlt think the Papacy can be destroyed. It was created by Jesus Christ, and o therefore can't be destroyed , like, perhaps, someone might destroy the USA Presidency , or the British monarchy.
I think Malachy Martin was half-right. There would be a pope who would TRY to destroy the papacy, but would neither have the time left, or the energy and support to do so.....that's Francis.
I still think the next Pope will be more like Benedict XVI, and even more hardline, than like Francis or worse.
Damian Malliapalli
Post a Comment