 |
| Sabrina Hout is being recommended by prosecutors for three months in prison, because she refused to conclude a "gay marriage". |
Sabrina Hout was voted in the municipal elections in 2014 as part of the ruling Socialist Party of Francoise Hollande as President to the Municipal Council of the VIII. Secteur Marseilles. Actually, the case should have been handled with caution. But it turned out differently.The Marseilles prosecutor, Marie Blanche Regnier, is asking for three months in prison and a fine of 1,500 euros because of "discrimination based on sexual orientation". The young District Vice Mayor in the second largest city in France after Paris refers to herself as "a practicing Muslim" and demanded "respect for her religious beliefs".
"Gay marriage" law does not provide for conscientious objection
Sabrina Hout is the first case in France, where a government representative has been brought to justice, since 2013, the Socialist Party, to which Hout belongs, legalized "gay marriage" (Marriage pour tous). The law put in force by President Hollande does not provide a clause for conscientious objection.
As at 16 August 2014, two lesbians appeared at the city hall of the VIII. Secteur to enter into a "gay marriage," while Hout, who is responsible for the family area, asked another council to represent them. That would, however, not have been possible for legal reasons. Hout, therefore, had to sign the relevant documents for the couple, but was represented at the ceremony for the actual formal act.
"Instead of Catholics and fascists we have a young, modern, leftist Muslim in front of us"
The Deputy Mayor was denounced in-house. The lesbian "gay marriage" was first canceled and then subsequently confirmed. The result was that they initiated a complaint against the Deputy Mayor. District Mayor Samia Ghali, of Algerian descent, also Moslem and socialist as Hout, withdrew her colleague from all responsibilities. The prosecutor opened proceedings for the falsification of documents.
On September 29 Hout will know whether the judges will follow the recommendation of the prosecutor. The prosecutor referred to her plea to fight on behalf of the two lesbians as "legitimate and correct."
The lawyer of the two complaintants, Philipe Vouland, is also pushing for a condemnation, "to set a precedent." Literally he said: "In the fight for marriage for all, the [homosexuals] associations expect to have to cross blades with proper heterosexuals, Catholics, sexists and fascists. Instead, we came across a young, modern, single, leftist woman, and Moslem."
Aberrosexual organizations have labelled Hout as a "homophobic monster"
Hout told the court that she had "never wanted to discriminate against anyone," but just wanted to respec her religious beliefs. She finds support in the Mayors' Association mayors pour l'enfance. This found that the Taubira-law legalizing "gay marriage" known as Article 9 of the ECHR, infringes upon the assurance to every person of freedom of thought, freedom of conscience and freedom of religion.
President Hollande had assured the French Mayors on 20 November 2012: "The law is applied to all, but in respect for freedom of conscience."
2015 brought nothing more to hear. The aberrosexual organizations have branded Sabrina Hout as a "homophobic monster." "You have insulted me by calling me a homophobe, which is completely false. I've been through Hell. My name was in all the newspapers ... At work I was insulted in every possible way, even as a terrorist and Jihadist!"
The lesbian couple, Claude and Helene, hopes to reach a judgment against Sabrina Hout that "is an example for the implementation of the law".
Text: Giuseppe Nardi
Image: Tempi
Image: Tempi
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotail.com
AMDG
33 comments:
Irreal. Le socialisme (socializmus) once again rejects science and human experience. S'il vous plait, o obtuses, notice who I am not mentioning and have no hope of explaining this to.
I encourage your hysterics, and to throw tantums at will.
Did I mention that Marie Blanche Regnier should not be confused with Regnery-Gateway Publishers or, 1,000 years before, Blanchefleur? Of course, Gaybriel/Michel would have mentioned that!
Yohann Roszéwitch, president of SOS-Homophobia, notes that "even the most refractory mayors have caved in." There has not been a single infringement of the law, he said in a media interview concerning the present affair. Seventeen thousand five hundred same-sex "marriages" have taken place since June 2013, some 4 percent of the total number. If its proponents are to be believed, such relationships have become mainstream." Just like Gaybriel/Michael in relation to this website!
J'oubliais dire <> Tancred.
<> c'est a dire
C'est qui est entre les aiguiles ne marche pas.
Enfin, Merci!
Now for the serious, but obvious comment: had she worn a headscarf this story would have never seen the light of day. The Revolution does indeed devour its own,
Mince, alors.
I wish I were back in France to convert her to Roman Catholicism. And the dozens, maybe hundreds like her, on the cusp.
Et, apres, Gaybriel, qui ne preferre pas les filles?
En verite, tu n'est pas Marcel!
Quel commedien! Quel air pretentieux!
You don't have to be politically right-wing, you don't have to be religious, to recognise that homosexuality is a mental illness and that gay 'marriage' is ridiculous.
Barnum brings up a good point. Where is the Catholic mission to Moslems? Here in the UK, the established church seems to have no interest in proselytising Moslems either.
The Catholic mission to the Moslems:
In 1452 Pope (St) Nicholas V issued the Bulla 'Dum Diversas' which authorized Spain and Portugal "to invade, vanquish and subdue all Saracens, pagans, and other enemies of Christ, to put them in perpetual slavery and to take away all their possessions and property."
This woman is not dressed like a "practicing Moslem". Not that it matters. Only an immoral idiot would hand out a license to something that is impossible and does not exist except in the minds of the evil and the insane.
That's the problem with Muslims they take their religion seriously unlike most Catholics.
And they have not forgotten the Crusades.
Which were in response to what, marcel?
Here's clue (cause it sounds like you don't have one)....
http://www.barnhardt.biz/2015/09/10/before-you-follow-pope-francis-command-to-prove-yourselves-worthy-of-him/
I those heterophobe monsters should be made an example of and not be allowed to bully someone who does not agree witeir sinful perversion. They can go elsewhere where someone is sure to oblige them.
Tap, tap, tap.
Go mince, Marcel/Gaybriel.
Le lypemanique continue s'imploser.
ohhhhhouuu Marcel.....your mother was a hamster, and your father smelled of elderberries!
What's your excuse?
Great point Marcel, the west has forgotten when good, brave Christian men stepped up to tyranny and said, no, we will not be subject to your evil religion and we will fight for the true faith, wish that more that more western Christians remembered this and thanks for pointing that out Marcel.
George Bush snr and jnr both picked up on that one O Oudeis, and left lasting legacies over there.
Gaybriel, I can only respond with a Spanish proverb specially adapted for you: "Cree el maricon/Que todos son/De su condicion."
Congratulations. It's appalling toro-sterc Spanish just like your attempts at French and Pigeon English.
Not a fan of slavery, which corrupts the slaver even more than the slave, but otherwise, I'm not seeing the problem with Pope Nicholas's bull. It was a crusade to fight a defensive war against resurgent Islam, which was on the brink of taking (and brutally sacking) Constantinople. One of the last of several declared by the Church.
Not sure what GB sr and Jr have to do with anything since they're not even christian, they're illumnati, nothing they were doing was in Christ's name or his will.
And Francis the apostate remains silent
Please spare us the homo patois and speak straight.
After you Bernice.
Post a Comment