Tancred suggested this morning that I write a post on the
importance of satire to explain to readers why I sully his newsfeed with pieces
intending to be funny, which “double as critiques of contemporary absurdities,”
as a certain friend put it. And lest anyone doubt, he fully supports and enjoys
my contributions to his blog and allows me my own policy when it comes to
deleting comments I deem unworthy.
As someone once noted, in order to be funny and rhetorically
effective, satire needs to have a certain amount of truth in it. The difficulty
that now besets us, however, is that so long as there is truth in a piece of
satire, a poor, unsuspecting bumpkin somewhere is going to be blind to the joke
and miss out on all the fun.
So please, people, get a grip when I mock our opponents by
linking articles from leftist (=sinister, usually) sources that are so
absurd that they clearly deserve little more than public ridicule and contempt,
if their authors refuse to recant their misguided views publicly.
As a side note, however, apparently I am not the only author
whose satire and parodies are not always appreciated. C. S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters was once upon a time also so misunderstood that one
reader cancelled his subscription to The Guardian, because he just didn’t
get it.
Then why do you delete it?
ReplyDeleteTake heart Mr. Hanlon...some people do indeed get it; it is just rather amazing how many have no sense of humor or irony. Keep up the excellent work!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Susan.
Delete