Tancred suggested this morning that I write a post on the
importance of satire to explain to readers why I sully his newsfeed with pieces
intending to be funny, which “double as critiques of contemporary absurdities,”
as a certain friend put it. And lest anyone doubt, he fully supports and enjoys
my contributions to his blog and allows me my own policy when it comes to
deleting comments I deem unworthy.
As someone once noted, in order to be funny and rhetorically
effective, satire needs to have a certain amount of truth in it. The difficulty
that now besets us, however, is that so long as there is truth in a piece of
satire, a poor, unsuspecting bumpkin somewhere is going to be blind to the joke
and miss out on all the fun.
So please, people, get a grip when I mock our opponents by
linking articles from leftist (=sinister, usually) sources that are so
absurd that they clearly deserve little more than public ridicule and contempt,
if their authors refuse to recant their misguided views publicly.
As a side note, however, apparently I am not the only author
whose satire and parodies are not always appreciated. C. S. Lewis’s The Screwtape Letters was once upon a time also so misunderstood that one
reader cancelled his subscription to The Guardian, because he just didn’t
get it.
3 comments:
Then why do you delete it?
Take heart Mr. Hanlon...some people do indeed get it; it is just rather amazing how many have no sense of humor or irony. Keep up the excellent work!
Thank you, Susan.
Post a Comment