Edit: we said it first in
September as soon as it was possible it could have been him. Indeed, a proper Mass for him
still isn’t impossible.
By John-Paul Ford Rojas7:26PM GMT 17 Mar 2013
[Telegraph] Dr John Ashdown-Hill argued that the monarch, killed in 1485 before the Reformation, was “a very religious man”.
He suggested that the split from Rome that took place a few decades later might never have happened were it not for Richard’s defeat at the hands of the Tudors.
The king’s skeletal remains were discovered under a car park in Leicester earlier this year and he is now expected to be buried at the city’s Anglican cathedral – since it is the nearest consecrated ground.
But the decision has proved controversial with many arguing he should be re-interred at York Minster because of his strong ties to the region. There has also been the question of his religious affiliation.
Dr Ashdown-Hill told the BBC: “There is a lot of evidence that Richard III had a very serious personal faith. If Richard III had not have died, maybe the Anglican church would never have existed.”
Maybe this Mass would look like this:
1 comment:
If King Richard is not given his final burial in the Latin Rite it will be Shame upon he who denies it. At the very least I would think that the Government and the Monarch would be embarrassed if the request is very public but denied.
Post a Comment