The General Superior of the Society of St. Pius X can't come to the most important yearly event of the German District. Was he expected in the Vatican?
(kreuz.net, Fulda) Bishop Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the Pristly Society of St. Pius X was expected to participate in this year's Fulda pilgrimage of the German district.
This was reported by the site 'pius.info'. The yearly pilgrimage of the German District has taken place nine times.
This year it is being held under the motto, "The Church -- our joy, our love, our pride".
The pilgrimage will renew the consecration of Germany to the Mother of God.
Is he being drawn to Rome?
Msgr Fellay has refused by reason of "other important obligations".
It is unclear which short term meeting is more important than the most important annual event of the German District.
The Bishop Celebrates in the Hotel
Instead of the General Superior, the French Society Bishop Tissier de Mallerais will appear instead.
He has proven himself an opponent of a diplomatic solution being reached without clarification of the dogmatic questions.
Msgr. De Mallerais is to celebrate the Mass in the large feast hall of the Orangerie in Fulda.
The celebration in a Fulda church would clearly not be allowed by the Old Liberal Bishop Heinz Josef Algermissen.
Link to kreuz.net...
2 comments:
IF THE SISTERS CAN GET CANONICAL STATUS THEN WHY NOT THE SSPX: THE REAL ISSUE IS THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA AND NOT VATICAN COUNCIL II
The Sisters of St.Benedict Center, Worcester,USA affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and so does the Society of St.Pius X(SSPX) in their General Chapter communique last month.Since they both affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma it means they do not accept any exceptions to the dogma in Vatican Council II.If any religious community in the Catholic Church accepts the literal interpretation of outside the church there is no salvation it means there are no known exceptions.
Vatican Council II does not contradict the dogma on exclusive salvation,at least, not for the sisters.For the Sisters of St.Benedict Center, Vatican Council II must affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Does it ? Yes.
The Sisters have canonical status when they affirm the dogma and Vatican Council II. Since they hold the literal interpretation of the dogma and it is not contradicted by the Council, their values are traditional on other religions, ecumenism and religious liberty. These are also the values of Vatican Council II for them. These are the same values of the SSPX.They emerge not because of Vatican Council II but because of the dogma.So the real issue is the dogma with respect to the values on other religions etc.
Since the SSPX,like the Sisters holds the literal interpretation of the dogma on salvation, Vatican Council II is traditional.It has to be traditional.This would apply to all religious communities who did the same.Vatican Council II would be traditional if they interpreted it according to the dogma and without the Cushing error of being able to see the dead saved in invincible ignorance etc who are assumed to be exceptions to the literal interpretation of Fr.Leonard Feeney, the saints, the Councils, the Catechism of the Catholic Church and Vatican Council I and II.
When all religious communities in the Catholic Church can accept Vatican Council II along with the dogma then they all have traditional values. It follows from accepting the dogma. They can all be still granted canonical status.
For instance the Franciscans, Dominicans, Cistercians etc can along with Vatican Council II also affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma and still maintain their canonical status.
So can the Sisters of St. Benedict Center.
So can the SSPX.
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) and Ecclesia Dei could make things easy for all ,by announcing the obvious : there are no known exceptions in Vatican Council II to the literal interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.
Vatican Coucil II will no more be a problem for the SSPX. The SSPX could announce that they accept Vatican Council II like the sisters, while holding to their traditional values and rejecting the theology of religions etc which are contradicted by the dogma and Vatican Council II.
So when the Sisters can be granted canonical status after holding the literal interpretation of the dogma with Vatican Council II and with traditional values, the same can be granted to the SSPX.
-Lionel Andrades
SSPX COULD CHOOSE THE SISTERS OF ST.BENEDICT CENTER MODEL FOR AFFIRMING VATICAN COUNCIL II IN ACCORD WITH TRADITION
The Sisters are traditionalists who affirm Vatican Council II in agreement with extra ecclesiam nulla salus and the Syllabus of Errors. They have been granted canonical status.
The Sisters, Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Worcester, affirm the literal interpretation of the dogma on exclusive salvation similar to the Society of St.Pius X (SSPX) July 19,2012 communique.The Sisters interpret Vatican council II according to Fr.Leonard Feeney and not Cardinal Richard Cushing.
For them Vatican Council II (AG 7) affirms the dogma according to Fr.Leonard Feeney while invincible ignorance etc (LG 16) are not exceptions to the dogma.
This religious community granted full canonical status knows there is no salvation outside the church.So the theology of religions and ecclesiology of communion would be irrational for them.
They acknowledge the possibility of a non Catholic being saved in invincible ignorance and the baptism of desire however for them this would also include receiving the baptism of water provided in a way known only to God.
Since there is no salvation outside the Chruch ,there being no known exceptions,this year or during the last 100 years or more,Vatican Council II is in accord with Tradition. The Council is traditional.The Council does not contradict the Syllabus of Errors, Pascendi, Mystici Corporis and of course extra ecclesiam nulla salus according to Fr.Leonard Feeney.
The Sisters of St.Benedict Center are a model for the SSPX to accept Vatican Council II and at the same time reject the non-traditional, irrational Ladaria-Koch version of the Council, based on the Richard Cushing error of claiming to be able to see the dead who are saved.
-Lionel Andrades
MSGR.CAMILLE PERL, SECRETARY OF ECCLESIA DEI IN A LETTER TO AN AUSTRALIAN LAYMAN DID NOT MENTION THAT THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND INVINCIBLE IGNORANCE WERE NOT EXCEPTIONS TO THE LITERAL INTERPRETATION OF THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS
http://eucharistandmission.blogspot.it/2012/08/msgrcamille-perl-secretatry-of-ecclesia.html#links
Post a Comment