Rumours of Discord within the Society of St. Pius X

Edit: If you wanted democracy, you should have signed up  for  a different religion. It also seems like it would be a good idea to keep your powder dry till a decision has been made one way or another and the way the many of the laity are lamenting the way this is going is interesting as well.  Was the Protestant Revolt a good idea after all?

[TIA] In order to obtain a modernist personal prelature, Bishop Fellay has transformed the work of Archbishop Lefebvre into a personal dictatorship, assisted by a small circle of a dozen priests inside the SSPX ranks. The founder, who always acted transparently before the faithful regarding his relations with Rome, was betrayed.

Accused of being a dictator and asked to resign

Increasingly isolated in his allegiance to the Rome of Benedict XVI, and after having silenced the writings of the founder [a lawsuit he filed forbidding the dissemination of the Archbishop�s sermons], Bishop Fellay now censures the two opposed Bishops plus the 30 superiors of SSPX who rejected this anti-natural merge. When will Bishop Fellay and Fr. Schmidberger be deposed, the infiltrated priests expelled, and this politics of betrayal be publicly condemned?

At Albano on October 4, 2011, Bishop Fellay reportedly did not show the text of the Doctrinal Preamble to the SSPX superiors, but only gave a spoken presentation of it. This demonstrates his lack of transparency and his suspicion toward the very members of the General Chapter. Along with his two executives - Frs. Pfluger and N�ly - Bishop Fellay seems to want to impose only his processus of merge-betrayal to the other superiors of the SSPX. 

Link to TIA...