It's so clear now. It's ok to be a pederast as long as you're not a Catholic pederast. It's ok to go to Thailand and exploit poor children who have nothing for sex, but even if you're falsely accused, to the gallows with you. Neither, Whoopi Goldberg nor Taki Theodoracopoulos will defend you, you'll just have to settle for a much maligned German website and a few Traditionalists here and there.
It don't matter how much you hate the Catholic Church, if you defend Roman Polanski, you're scum and probably do some of the same things he's guilty of yourselves.
This is from kreuznet:
France's Minister of Pederasty Goes on Rampage
According to France's Pedo-Minister, Frederic Mitterand, the act of heroism was described as "unacceptable" .The completely unsatisfactor AP article, below:
Mitterand is a homosexually distrurbed individual, who has defended the condemned child rapist Roman Polanski.
Whoever felt themselves injured by this blasphemy, must turn themselves to -- idle -- Justice, which exclamation made Mitterand more ridiculous than he already is.
Every kind of the destruction or "intolerance" is not acceptable.
Last Saturday 1.800 Catholics, who are close to the Society of St. Pius X, demonstrated against the "Urine Christ".
They effected the temporary closure of the museum.
MARSEILLE, France — Police in the south of France on Monday sought two vandals who destroyed a US artist's photograph of a plastic crucifix submerged in urine that outraged American conservatives in the 1980s.
Two men armed with a hammer and a screwdriver-like device attacked "Piss Christ" by New York-based Andres Serrano at the Collection Lambert museum of contemporary art in Avignon on Sunday, officials said.
A second Serrano photograph, "The Church: Sister Jeanne Myriam," was also targeted in the late-morning incident in which three guards who tried to intervene were assaulted, the museum's founder Yvon Lambert said.
Link to AP, here...
Photo taken from alleged "art" site, here.
5 comments:
He who honors me, I will honor.
God Bless 'em.
Why reproduce the disgusting work here?
Why even discuss it?
The same artist painted the most beautiful depiction in his work, Maddona and Child 11, to be found on the site of Corcoran; A Capital Collection.
It has the same amber background as the work in dispute, evoking a corporeal in-utero connection.
The same connection can be made of the latter, whereby the urine connection can be with the ultimate fear experienced by many, and therefore with the humanity of Christ on the cross.
The only off putting is the expression of words commonly used today and not only by those living on the edges of society, ultimately with whom Christ identifies with.
Post a Comment