[Translation by Google Translate] Motu Proprio coming? The news is not official and deserves confirmation. The news is not official and deserves confirmation. In traditional talk of a motu proprio by Pope Benedict XVI would think to unlock the stalemate in talks with the doctrinal Society of Saint Pius X. In traditional talk of a motu proprio by Pope Benedict XVI Would think to unlock the stalemate in talks with the Society of Saint Pius X. doctrinal The solution could be the promulgation of a papal motu proprio that relieves the fraternity from an explicit acceptance of Vatican II and acceptance of new entry, with full restoration in communion with Rome. The Solution Could Be the promulgation of a papal motu proprio That Relieves the fraternity from an explicit acceptance of Vatican II and acceptance of new entry, with full restoration to communion with Rome. In return, the traditionalists should explicitly accept the Catechism of John Paul II in 1992 and this would be the greatest obstacle. In return, the traditionalists Should Explicitly accept the Catechism of John Paul II in 1992 and this Would be the greatest obstacle. Broad sectors within traditional feel with reason, this thoroughly modern catechism and contrary to orthodox Catholic values and therefore the negotiations could get stuck on that. Broad Sectors Within traditional feel, with reason, this Catechism and Thoroughly Modern Contrary to orthodox Catholic values and the Negotiations Therefore Could get stuck on that. We'll see, but by papal there will be decided, quite wisely, to unblock the situation of the traditionalists of the fraternity who have given so far shown great devotion to the Pope and the Catholic Church. We'll see, But There Will Be Decided by papal, quite wisely, to unblock the situation of the traditionalists of the fraternity Who Have Given So Far shown great devotion to the Pope and the Catholic Church.
Link to Bruno Volpe's site...
I find the terminology "John Paul II's Catechism" quite a mouthful. And most interesting.
ReplyDeleteBut to make a point why should I accept John Paul II's catechism when there are so many better ones around? His new catechism is terrible, and ambiguous, and pretty much worthless.
I'll stick with the tried and true, thank you very much.